RE: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF
I can't support Wolf's approach but would support the following version: - Communicate to ICANN that the council would like to see the agenda, to know what arrangements have been made to transcribe and/or record the meeting, and know what the additional cost is to ICANN. - Based on Staff response to the above, the Council can make an informed decision as to whether to formally approve the Chair attending. - If Stephane decides to attend without that, he is not attending in his capacity as Chair, only because of it. - Either way, the Council cannot be committed to anything during the meeting without Council approval, and Stephane cannot commit to anything in his capacity as Chair without Council approval. - Either way, Stephane should provide a comprehensive report to the GNSO weekend session. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF From: "Mary Wong" <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> Date: Thu, January 20, 2011 11:15 am To: Cc: <council@gnso.icann.org> Hello again, and sorry if my last email wasn't clear. I'd like to clarify that I don't oppose the idea of such a meeting, but would like more information as to its purpose and agenda (given that it is 2 days). As such, I support Wolf's approach. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>To:"<KnobenW@telekom.de>" <KnobenW@telekom.de>CC:<council@gnso.icann.org>Date: 1/20/2011 9:40 AMSubject: Re: AW: AW: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF Thanks for those excellent suggestions Wolf. What do others think about this approach, which I would support as it sends a more gentle signal than simply "we're not going to attend"?
- communicate to ICANN that the council has some reservations regarding this meeting - if the meeting takes place you should attend - provide a comprehensive report to the GNSO weekend session
Stéphane As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
Where is this at Stéphane? Is it possible to get a response directly from Rod on the comments made thus far? Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 4:52 AM To: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF I can't support Wolf's approach but would support the following version: - Communicate to ICANN that the council would like to see the agenda, to know what arrangements have been made to transcribe and/or record the meeting, and know what the additional cost is to ICANN. - Based on Staff response to the above, the Council can make an informed decision as to whether to formally approve the Chair attending. - If Stephane decides to attend without that, he is not attending in his capacity as Chair, only because of it. - Either way, the Council cannot be committed to anything during the meeting without Council approval, and Stephane cannot commit to anything in his capacity as Chair without Council approval. - Either way, Stephane should provide a comprehensive report to the GNSO weekend session. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF From: "Mary Wong" <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> Date: Thu, January 20, 2011 11:15 am To: Cc: <council@gnso.icann.org> Hello again, and sorry if my last email wasn't clear. I'd like to clarify that I don't oppose the idea of such a meeting, but would like more information as to its purpose and agenda (given that it is 2 days). As such, I support Wolf's approach. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>To:"<KnobenW@telekom.de>" <KnobenW@telekom.de>CC:<council@gnso.icann.org>Date: 1/20/2011 9:40 AMSubject: Re: AW: AW: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF Thanks for those excellent suggestions Wolf. What do others think about this approach, which I would support as it sends a more gentle signal than simply "we're not going to attend"?
- communicate to ICANN that the council has some reservations regarding this meeting - if the meeting takes place you should attend - provide a comprehensive report to the GNSO weekend session
Stéphane As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
participants (2)
-
Adrian Kinderis -
Tim Ruiz