FW: GAC Liaison the GAC
All, Please be aware that the note below has today been sent out to Mason Cole. A similar note has been sent to the applicants who were not successful this time. You can expect a motion to this effect to be put forward to the GNSO Council meeting on September 4th. Thanks, Jonathan From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: 13 August 2014 09:47 To: Mason Cole Subject: GAC Liaison the GAC Dear Mason, On behalf of the GNSO Council leadership team, we would like to thank you very much for your application and your willingness to volunteer for this position to support the activities of GNSO Council. The applications received were all of extremely high quality and it was a difficult choice to make. The three evaluators have carefully and thoroughly evaluated each application against the specified criteria. Following this process, I am pleased to be able to inform you that your application was selected to be put forward to the GNSO Council for the position of GNSO Liaison to the GAC. A motion to support your selection will be put before the GNSO Council at the September 4th meeting of the Council. On behalf of the GNSO Council, thank you very much for taking the time and care to submit a letter and statement of interest. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/> http://gnso.icann.org
Hi, Thanks for the update, Jonathan, and thanks to the Council leadership team for their considerations and selection. I was wondering wether or not others feel it necessary and desirable to set a term limit for the GNSO liaison to the GAC when considering drawing up the motion. Perhaps a two-year term limit with the option of renewal similar to a Councillor’s term. We haven’t really discussed this, and their are not guidelines in the operating procedures to steer by. Just a thought…, and thanks again. Amr On Aug 13, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
Please be aware that the note below has today been sent out to Mason Cole.
A similar note has been sent to the applicants who were not successful this time.
You can expect a motion to this effect to be put forward to the GNSO Council meeting on September 4th.
Thanks,
Jonathan
From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: 13 August 2014 09:47 To: Mason Cole Subject: GAC Liaison the GAC
Dear Mason,
On behalf of the GNSO Council leadership team, we would like to thank you very much for your application and your willingness to volunteer for this position to support the activities of GNSO Council.
The applications received were all of extremely high quality and it was a difficult choice to make. The three evaluators have carefully and thoroughly evaluated each application against the specified criteria. Following this process, I am pleased to be able to inform you that your application was selected to be put forward to the GNSO Council for the position of GNSO Liaison to the GAC. A motion to support your selection will be put before the GNSO Council at the September 4th meeting of the Council.
On behalf of the GNSO Council, thank you very much for taking the time and care to submit a letter and statement of interest.
Kind regards, Glen
Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
Hi Amr, As this is a pilot for a one year duration (FY2015) the term will end on 30 June 2015 following which the GAC and GNSO Council will review the pilot and determine whether to continue or not. Should a determination be made that the liaison role should continue, further consideration would indeed need to be given to duration of the term as well as possible limitations. Best regards, Marika On 13 aug. 2014, at 13:37, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr@egyptig.org<mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org>> wrote: Hi, Thanks for the update, Jonathan, and thanks to the Council leadership team for their considerations and selection. I was wondering wether or not others feel it necessary and desirable to set a term limit for the GNSO liaison to the GAC when considering drawing up the motion. Perhaps a two-year term limit with the option of renewal similar to a Councillor's term. We haven't really discussed this, and their are not guidelines in the operating procedures to steer by. Just a thought..., and thanks again. Amr On Aug 13, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> wrote: All, Please be aware that the note below has today been sent out to Mason Cole. A similar note has been sent to the applicants who were not successful this time. You can expect a motion to this effect to be put forward to the GNSO Council meeting on September 4th. Thanks, Jonathan From: Glen de Saint G?ry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: 13 August 2014 09:47 To: Mason Cole Subject: GAC Liaison the GAC Dear Mason, On behalf of the GNSO Council leadership team, we would like to thank you very much for your application and your willingness to volunteer for this position to support the activities of GNSO Council. The applications received were all of extremely high quality and it was a difficult choice to make. The three evaluators have carefully and thoroughly evaluated each application against the specified criteria. Following this process, I am pleased to be able to inform you that your application was selected to be put forward to the GNSO Council for the position of GNSO Liaison to the GAC. A motion to support your selection will be put before the GNSO Council at the September 4th meeting of the Council. On behalf of the GNSO Council, thank you very much for taking the time and care to submit a letter and statement of interest. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint G?ry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>
Ah, right. Thanks Marika. Amr Sent from mobile
On Aug 13, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Amr,
As this is a pilot for a one year duration (FY2015) the term will end on 30 June 2015 following which the GAC and GNSO Council will review the pilot and determine whether to continue or not. Should a determination be made that the liaison role should continue, further consideration would indeed need to be given to duration of the term as well as possible limitations.
Best regards,
Marika
On 13 aug. 2014, at 13:37, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the update, Jonathan, and thanks to the Council leadership team for their considerations and selection.
I was wondering wether or not others feel it necessary and desirable to set a term limit for the GNSO liaison to the GAC when considering drawing up the motion. Perhaps a two-year term limit with the option of renewal similar to a Councillor’s term. We haven’t really discussed this, and their are not guidelines in the operating procedures to steer by.
Just a thought…, and thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 13, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
Please be aware that the note below has today been sent out to Mason Cole.
A similar note has been sent to the applicants who were not successful this time.
You can expect a motion to this effect to be put forward to the GNSO Council meeting on September 4th.
Thanks,
Jonathan
From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: 13 August 2014 09:47 To: Mason Cole Subject: GAC Liaison the GAC
Dear Mason,
On behalf of the GNSO Council leadership team, we would like to thank you very much for your application and your willingness to volunteer for this position to support the activities of GNSO Council.
The applications received were all of extremely high quality and it was a difficult choice to make. The three evaluators have carefully and thoroughly evaluated each application against the specified criteria. Following this process, I am pleased to be able to inform you that your application was selected to be put forward to the GNSO Council for the position of GNSO Liaison to the GAC. A motion to support your selection will be put before the GNSO Council at the September 4th meeting of the Council.
On behalf of the GNSO Council, thank you very much for taking the time and care to submit a letter and statement of interest.
Kind regards, Glen
Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org
Works for me. Mason is an excellent choice and I support the 1 year "pilot" term. Thanks- J. From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org<mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 at 6:53 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] FW: GAC Liaison the GAC Ah, right. Thanks Marika. Amr Sent from mobile On Aug 13, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote: Hi Amr, As this is a pilot for a one year duration (FY2015) the term will end on 30 June 2015 following which the GAC and GNSO Council will review the pilot and determine whether to continue or not. Should a determination be made that the liaison role should continue, further consideration would indeed need to be given to duration of the term as well as possible limitations. Best regards, Marika On 13 aug. 2014, at 13:37, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr@egyptig.org<mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org>> wrote: Hi, Thanks for the update, Jonathan, and thanks to the Council leadership team for their considerations and selection. I was wondering wether or not others feel it necessary and desirable to set a term limit for the GNSO liaison to the GAC when considering drawing up the motion. Perhaps a two-year term limit with the option of renewal similar to a Councillor's term. We haven't really discussed this, and their are not guidelines in the operating procedures to steer by. Just a thought..., and thanks again. Amr On Aug 13, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> wrote: All, Please be aware that the note below has today been sent out to Mason Cole. A similar note has been sent to the applicants who were not successful this time. You can expect a motion to this effect to be put forward to the GNSO Council meeting on September 4th. Thanks, Jonathan From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: 13 August 2014 09:47 To: Mason Cole Subject: GAC Liaison the GAC Dear Mason, On behalf of the GNSO Council leadership team, we would like to thank you very much for your application and your willingness to volunteer for this position to support the activities of GNSO Council. The applications received were all of extremely high quality and it was a difficult choice to make. The three evaluators have carefully and thoroughly evaluated each application against the specified criteria. Following this process, I am pleased to be able to inform you that your application was selected to be put forward to the GNSO Council for the position of GNSO Liaison to the GAC. A motion to support your selection will be put before the GNSO Council at the September 4th meeting of the Council. On behalf of the GNSO Council, thank you very much for taking the time and care to submit a letter and statement of interest. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>
participants (4)
-
Amr Elsadr -
James M. Bladel -
Jonathan Robinson -
Marika Konings