Hello, Thanks Bruce for reading the charter for me on the call; unfortunately my connection again dropped off for the third time, so I'm back in my office to send this. In general, I would agree to proceed with a limited scope of the WG as being currently defined. I'd further suggest the council considering instead of "identify and prioritize policy issues..." (I'm writing from the top of my head from what I heard on the call earlier on), the following wording "identify and specify the relevant policy issues etc." For the records, I'd like the council to take note that I advise it is unfair, in terms of openness and transparency, not to give to all constituency members the opportunity to volunteer for the WG but also to compete as a potential chair. So I'd like to see the council vote on the way forward for this process. If the majority agrees to carry on with the current membership and elect the chair, I will have to accept it, but wanted to have my reservations on the records. For the remaining business, if there is a need for a vote, I'd like Robin Gross to carry my vote. Thank you, and success. Mawaki