Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary
Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams. I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies. It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding this both of which are time sensitive: 1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so, develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meeting. Note that comments are due the end of January. 2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the four review teams. Because the Accountability & Transparency Review will start early in 2010, we should start work on this right away. Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting: 7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams 7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal 7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO? If so, develop plan. 7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the four review teams? (Next steps?) All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named at the beginning of the document. Chuck
A very good summary, thanks for going to the trouble of writing it Chuck. To me, the crucial element here is working out how we want to identify and submit volunteers. I don't see Council comments as being that important in this instance. So I think it would be good to have a chance to start our discussion on the first topic on the list, in anticipation of our next Council meeting. Stéphane Le 30 déc. 2009 à 06:27, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams. I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies.
It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding this both of which are time sensitive:
1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so, develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meeting. Note that comments are due the end of January.
2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the four review teams. Because the Accountability & Transparency Review will start early in 2010, we should start work on this right away.
Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting:
7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams
7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal
7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO? If so, develop plan.
7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the four review teams? (Next steps?)
All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named at the beginning of the document.
Chuck <AoC Review Teams summary prepared by Chuck Gomes 29 Dec 09 for GNSO Council.doc>
Chuck, Thanks for the summary. I think that GNSO representation is low, and we should be allowed to have one representative from each of the houses in the review teams. I would like to volunteer myself for representing GNSO in the Accountability and Transparency Review Team. In this sense and once the plan for identifying volunteers is defined, I would appreciate GNSO Council to considering this offer. Happy new year to all!! Regards Olga 2009/12/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com>:
Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams. I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies.
It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding this both of which are time sensitive:
1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so, develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meetinAccountability & Transparency Review g. Note that comments are due the end of January.
2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the four review teams. Because the will start early in 2010, we should start work on this right away.
Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting:
7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams
7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal
7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO? If so, develop plan.
7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the four review teams? (Next steps?)
All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named at the beginning of the document.
Chuck
Thanks Olga. I think we have a lot of work to do before we start thinking about volunteers. Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: olgacavalli@gmail.com [mailto:olgacavalli@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:32 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary
Chuck, Thanks for the summary. I think that GNSO representation is low, and we should be allowed to have one representative from each of the houses in the review teams. I would like to volunteer myself for representing GNSO in the Accountability and Transparency Review Team. In this sense and once the plan for identifying volunteers is defined, I would appreciate GNSO Council to considering this offer. Happy new year to all!! Regards Olga
2009/12/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com>:
Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams. I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies.
It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding this both of which are time sensitive:
1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so, develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meetinAccountability & Transparency Review g. Note that comments are due the end of January.
2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the four review teams. Because the will start early in 2010, we should start work on this right away.
Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting:
7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams
7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal
7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO? If so, develop plan.
7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the four review teams? (Next steps?)
All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named at the beginning of the document.
Chuck
I agree that there's a lot we need to look at. Chuck's document is an excellent starting point for some of the discussions that it seems clear we should have before determining our way forward on this topic. For example, we may want to consider looking for volunteers outside the Council. This may be a good opportunity to boost GNSO-wide participation... Stéphane Le 31 déc. 2009 à 20:53, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
Thanks Olga. I think we have a lot of work to do before we start thinking about volunteers.
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: olgacavalli@gmail.com [mailto:olgacavalli@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:32 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary
Chuck, Thanks for the summary. I think that GNSO representation is low, and we should be allowed to have one representative from each of the houses in the review teams. I would like to volunteer myself for representing GNSO in the Accountability and Transparency Review Team. In this sense and once the plan for identifying volunteers is defined, I would appreciate GNSO Council to considering this offer. Happy new year to all!! Regards Olga
2009/12/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com>:
Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams. I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies.
It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding this both of which are time sensitive:
1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so, develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meetinAccountability & Transparency Review g. Note that comments are due the end of January.
2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the four review teams. Because the will start early in 2010, we should start work on this right away.
Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting:
7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams
7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal
7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO? If so, develop plan.
7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the four review teams? (Next steps?)
All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named at the beginning of the document.
Chuck
participants (3)
-
Gomes, Chuck -
Olga Cavalli -
Stéphane Van Gelder