FW: [Soac-leadership] Final - Process for Retirement of Non-Policy Recommendations
Dear Councilors, I am forwarding this note regarding the process for retirement of non-policy recommendations because it appears that feedback provided by the GNSO was incorporated. Thanks, Greg From: Soac-leadership <soac-leadership-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alperen Eken Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 8:12 AM To: soac-leadership@icann.org Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Soac-leadership] Final - Process for Retirement of Non-Policy Recommendations CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Resending this email based on Alejandra’s feedback regarding the audience, accept my apologies if you receive this email twice. Dear SO/AC Leaders, I would like to thank you again for the opportunity to share the Proposed Process for Retirement of Non-Policy Recommendations with you in September, and for the feedback we received in the ensuing consultation<https://community.icann.org/display/PTRNR>. We are pleased to inform you that the process has been refined to address the areas for improvement identified by the GNSO Council<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/273454137/dibiase-to-seppia-04dec23.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1701767670000&api=v2>, and the ccNSO Council and its Guideline Review Committee Council<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/273454137/ccNSO%20Comment%20-%20proposal%20to%20retire%20non-policy%20recommendations.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1702024446000&api=v2>. More in details: * A new step 2 was added to allow for the issue paper to be sent to SO/AC leaders, along with a request to send any feedback from their communities. This earlier community engagement will allow ICANN org to gauge initial reaction, and will serve to better inform the relevant grouping(s) of the ICANN Board on whether to proceed with the next step, which entails submitting the paper to the community prioritization group. * The process was also modified to enable any SO/AC that selected members to the Specific Review or served as a Chartering Organization to the Cross-Community Working Group that generated the recommendation at issue, to request that ICANN org initiates the retirement process. Should you have any further questions about the process (see attached), please feel free to reach out to me or my team. (giovanni.seppia@icann.org<mailto:giovanni.seppia@icann.org>, alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>) Sincerely, Alp Eken on behalf of Giovanni Seppia, Vice-President - Implementation Operations, ICANN
Thanks Greg, that's a good outcome. Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy Com Laude T +44 (0) 20 7421 8250 Ext 255 Follow us on Linkedin<https://t-uk.xink.io/Tracking/Index/pRkAAGVfAADw_RQA0> and YouTube<https://t-uk.xink.io/Tracking/Index/bhkAAGVfAADw_RQA0> From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of DiBiase, Gregory via council Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 6:10 PM To: COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG Subject: [council] FW: [Soac-leadership] Final - Process for Retirement of Non-Policy Recommendations Dear Councilors, I am forwarding this note regarding the process for retirement of non-policy recommendations because it appears that feedback provided by the GNSO was incorporated. Thanks, Greg From: Soac-leadership <soac-leadership-bounces@icann.org<mailto:soac-leadership-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Alperen Eken Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 8:12 AM To: soac-leadership@icann.org<mailto:soac-leadership@icann.org> Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Soac-leadership] Final - Process for Retirement of Non-Policy Recommendations CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Resending this email based on Alejandra's feedback regarding the audience, accept my apologies if you receive this email twice. Dear SO/AC Leaders, I would like to thank you again for the opportunity to share the Proposed Process for Retirement of Non-Policy Recommendations with you in September, and for the feedback we received in the ensuing consultation<https://community.icann.org/display/PTRNR>. We are pleased to inform you that the process has been refined to address the areas for improvement identified by the GNSO Council<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/273454137/dibiase-to-seppia-04dec23.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1701767670000&api=v2>, and the ccNSO Council and its Guideline Review Committee Council<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/273454137/ccNSO%20Comment%20-%20proposal%20to%20retire%20non-policy%20recommendations.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1702024446000&api=v2>. More in details: * A new step 2 was added to allow for the issue paper to be sent to SO/AC leaders, along with a request to send any feedback from their communities. This earlier community engagement will allow ICANN org to gauge initial reaction, and will serve to better inform the relevant grouping(s) of the ICANN Board on whether to proceed with the next step, which entails submitting the paper to the community prioritization group. * The process was also modified to enable any SO/AC that selected members to the Specific Review or served as a Chartering Organization to the Cross-Community Working Group that generated the recommendation at issue, to request that ICANN org initiates the retirement process. Should you have any further questions about the process (see attached), please feel free to reach out to me or my team. (giovanni.seppia@icann.org<mailto:giovanni.seppia@icann.org>, alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>) Sincerely, Alp Eken on behalf of Giovanni Seppia, Vice-President - Implementation Operations, ICANN ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that Com Laude Group Limited (the "Com Laude Group") does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group is a limited company registered in England and Wales with company number 10689074 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 6181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176 and registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, a corporation incorporated in the State of Washington and principal office address at Suite 332, Securities Building, 1904 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan with company number 0100-01-190853 and registered office at 1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan; Com Laude Domain ESP S.L.U., a company registered in Spain and registered office address at Calle Barcas 2, 2, Valencia, 46002, Spain. For further information see www.comlaude.com<https://comlaude.com/>
participants (2)
-
DiBiase, Gregory -
Susan Payne