GNSO Council response to GAC communique
Fellow Councilors Please find attached the GNSO Council's proposed response to the GAC communique from Abu Dhabi, along with a motion to approve the response at our upcoming meeting on 30 November 2017. Regards Donna Donna Austin
Dear Donna, all, I have reviewed the document for a final sanity check and made some very minor typographical edits for consistency in the attached. The only substantive edits are that we hadn't filled out columns 3 and 4 (does the advice concern GNSO remit and is it subject to existing work or recommendations) for a few items. I have inserted text here but would appreciate the drafting team casting eyes over, as it may well be that there was a reason for not responding to these, and I missed that. Finally, *a plea that everyone socialise this Response this week **within SGs and Cs *and raise any concerns or proposed edits *prior to Thursday's Council meeting.* Our response is only effective if it reaches the Board in a timely manner as the Board considers the relevant GAC advice. For this to occur, we need a Response that we can agree on and approve in Thursday's meeting. If any SG/C has concerns, I ask that you please raise these on the list as soon as possible. Many thanks to the drafting team and to Donna for shepherding this effort from Council leadership. It's brilliant to have such efficient production of the response, even with the interruption of North American Thanksgiving holidays. Best wishes, Heather On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Austin, Donna via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Fellow Councilors
Please find attached the GNSO Council’s proposed response to the GAC communique from Abu Dhabi, along with a motion to approve the response at our upcoming meeting on 30 November 2017.
Regards
Donna
Donna Austin
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Many thanks for the sanity check Heather. From: Heather Forrest [mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 9:27 PM To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin@team.neustar> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] GNSO Council response to GAC communique Dear Donna, all, I have reviewed the document for a final sanity check and made some very minor typographical edits for consistency in the attached. The only substantive edits are that we hadn't filled out columns 3 and 4 (does the advice concern GNSO remit and is it subject to existing work or recommendations) for a few items. I have inserted text here but would appreciate the drafting team casting eyes over, as it may well be that there was a reason for not responding to these, and I missed that. Finally, a plea that everyone socialise this Response this week within SGs and Cs and raise any concerns or proposed edits prior to Thursday's Council meeting. Our response is only effective if it reaches the Board in a timely manner as the Board considers the relevant GAC advice. For this to occur, we need a Response that we can agree on and approve in Thursday's meeting. If any SG/C has concerns, I ask that you please raise these on the list as soon as possible. Many thanks to the drafting team and to Donna for shepherding this effort from Council leadership. It's brilliant to have such efficient production of the response, even with the interruption of North American Thanksgiving holidays. Best wishes, Heather On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Austin, Donna via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Fellow Councilors Please find attached the GNSO Council’s proposed response to the GAC communique from Abu Dhabi, along with a motion to approve the response at our upcoming meeting on 30 November 2017. Regards Donna Donna Austin _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_council&d=DwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=a1Ht8PleMEbRUQAOOKl7sGYVhDwMFjEXy-KEzseMBws&s=Ec9xOiDhdU7cPe0rUx6O2jNyxTJUGKvSIusJ-ydr2Lw&e=>
Hi Heather, After discussions in the BC we would like to add the following language to the response to the GAC advice. "The GNSO Council agrees with the GAC that the continued and lawful availability of WHOIS/RDS data for consumer protection, intellectual property rights protection and law enforcement activities is a vital public concern and that ICANN should strive to explore all possible mechanisms under the GDPR to ensure that this data remains available for legitimate activities that protect the public and promote a safe, secure, and trustworthy online environment. Especially, when the WHOIS/RDS data is associated with a domain name used for commercial activity." Best regards, Susan On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Donna, all,
I have reviewed the document for a final sanity check and made some very minor typographical edits for consistency in the attached. The only substantive edits are that we hadn't filled out columns 3 and 4 (does the advice concern GNSO remit and is it subject to existing work or recommendations) for a few items. I have inserted text here but would appreciate the drafting team casting eyes over, as it may well be that there was a reason for not responding to these, and I missed that.
Finally, *a plea that everyone socialise this Response this week **within SGs and Cs *and raise any concerns or proposed edits *prior to Thursday's Council meeting.* Our response is only effective if it reaches the Board in a timely manner as the Board considers the relevant GAC advice. For this to occur, we need a Response that we can agree on and approve in Thursday's meeting. If any SG/C has concerns, I ask that you please raise these on the list as soon as possible.
Many thanks to the drafting team and to Donna for shepherding this effort from Council leadership. It's brilliant to have such efficient production of the response, even with the interruption of North American Thanksgiving holidays.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Austin, Donna via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Fellow Councilors
Please find attached the GNSO Council’s proposed response to the GAC communique from Abu Dhabi, along with a motion to approve the response at our upcoming meeting on 30 November 2017.
Regards
Donna
Donna Austin
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Thanks, Susan - I'm including GNSO Secretariat so they have the language immediately to hand. Staff- would it be possible to include this in brackets in the document before it's posted? Many thanks to all, Heather On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
After discussions in the BC we would like to add the following language to the response to the GAC advice.
"The GNSO Council agrees with the GAC that the continued and lawful availability of WHOIS/RDS data for consumer protection, intellectual property rights protection and law enforcement activities is a vital public concern and that ICANN should strive to explore all possible mechanisms under the GDPR to ensure that this data remains available for legitimate activities that protect the public and promote a safe, secure, and trustworthy online environment. Especially, when the WHOIS/RDS data is associated with a domain name used for commercial activity."
Best regards,
Susan
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Donna, all,
I have reviewed the document for a final sanity check and made some very minor typographical edits for consistency in the attached. The only substantive edits are that we hadn't filled out columns 3 and 4 (does the advice concern GNSO remit and is it subject to existing work or recommendations) for a few items. I have inserted text here but would appreciate the drafting team casting eyes over, as it may well be that there was a reason for not responding to these, and I missed that.
Finally, *a plea that everyone socialise this Response this week **within SGs and Cs *and raise any concerns or proposed edits *prior to Thursday's Council meeting.* Our response is only effective if it reaches the Board in a timely manner as the Board considers the relevant GAC advice. For this to occur, we need a Response that we can agree on and approve in Thursday's meeting. If any SG/C has concerns, I ask that you please raise these on the list as soon as possible.
Many thanks to the drafting team and to Donna for shepherding this effort from Council leadership. It's brilliant to have such efficient production of the response, even with the interruption of North American Thanksgiving holidays.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Austin, Donna via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Fellow Councilors
Please find attached the GNSO Council’s proposed response to the GAC communique from Abu Dhabi, along with a motion to approve the response at our upcoming meeting on 30 November 2017.
Regards
Donna
Donna Austin
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Susan It would have been helpful if the proposed language had been provided further in advance of the meeting in order to allow for discussion. I personally cannot agree to the addition of your suggested language. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com https://blacknight.blog / http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow, R93 X265 ,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy@gmail.com> Date: Thursday 30 November 2017 at 20:53 To: Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> Cc: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council response to GAC communique Hi Heather, After discussions in the BC we would like to add the following language to the response to the GAC advice. "The GNSO Council agrees with the GAC that the continued and lawful availability of WHOIS/RDS data for consumer protection, intellectual property rights protection and law enforcement activities is a vital public concern and that ICANN should strive to explore all possible mechanisms under the GDPR to ensure that this data remains available for legitimate activities that protect the public and promote a safe, secure, and trustworthy online environment. Especially, when the WHOIS/RDS data is associated with a domain name used for commercial activity." Best regards, Susan On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Donna, all, I have reviewed the document for a final sanity check and made some very minor typographical edits for consistency in the attached. The only substantive edits are that we hadn't filled out columns 3 and 4 (does the advice concern GNSO remit and is it subject to existing work or recommendations) for a few items. I have inserted text here but would appreciate the drafting team casting eyes over, as it may well be that there was a reason for not responding to these, and I missed that. Finally, a plea that everyone socialise this Response this week within SGs and Cs and raise any concerns or proposed edits prior to Thursday's Council meeting. Our response is only effective if it reaches the Board in a timely manner as the Board considers the relevant GAC advice. For this to occur, we need a Response that we can agree on and approve in Thursday's meeting. If any SG/C has concerns, I ask that you please raise these on the list as soon as possible. Many thanks to the drafting team and to Donna for shepherding this effort from Council leadership. It's brilliant to have such efficient production of the response, even with the interruption of North American Thanksgiving holidays. Best wishes, Heather On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Austin, Donna via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Fellow Councilors Please find attached the GNSO Council’s proposed response to the GAC communique from Abu Dhabi, along with a motion to approve the response at our upcoming meeting on 30 November 2017. Regards Donna Donna Austin _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
participants (4)
-
Austin, Donna -
Heather Forrest -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight -
Susan Kawaguchi