Did we receive a briefing paper on the process for amendments to sTLD charters?
All, I was just reading the BGC's December 9, 2010 recommendation on the .jobs Charter Compliance Coalition reconsideration request and came across this footnote on page 12: 4 The BGC also thinks that the Board should address the need for a process to evaluate amendments that may have the effect of changing, or seeking to change, an sTLD Charter or Stated Purpose of a sponsored, restricted or community-based TLD. Because such a process may impact gTLDs greatly and is a policy issue, the GNSO is the natural starting point for evaluating such a process. We therefore further recommend that the Board direct the CEO to create a briefing paper for the GNSO to consider on this matter, and for the GNSO to determine whether a policy development process should be commenced. I don't recall receiving any such briefing paper. Did we receive one? If so, would the relevant staff person mind sending me a copy of it? Thanks! K
Kristina, A paper was posted on February 21, 2011 (http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/explantory-memo-community-change-re...); which was heavily objected to on a number of grounds by the RySG. In our view, there were a number of flawed assumptions in there as well as too heavy a hand by ICANN. I am not sure if someone from staff forwarded this to you, so I thought I would and send it to the Council. At a few of the meetings, I brought this up at the council level (in San Francisco in particular), but the Council did not seem interested in taking it up at the time (or maybe they weren't paying attention :)) Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:48 AM To: 'council@gnso.icann.org' Subject: [council] Did we receive a briefing paper on the process for amendments to sTLD charters? All, I was just reading the BGC's December 9, 2010 recommendation on the .jobs Charter Compliance Coalition reconsideration request and came across this footnote on page 12: 4 The BGC also thinks that the Board should address the need for a process to evaluate amendments that may have the effect of changing, or seeking to change, an sTLD Charter or Stated Purpose of a sponsored, restricted or community-based TLD. Because such a process may impact gTLDs greatly and is a policy issue, the GNSO is the natural starting point for evaluating such a process. We therefore further recommend that the Board direct the CEO to create a briefing paper for the GNSO to consider on this matter, and for the GNSO to determine whether a policy development process should be commenced. I don't recall receiving any such briefing paper. Did we receive one? If so, would the relevant staff person mind sending me a copy of it? Thanks! K
Thanks, Jeff. I didn't realize that the linked paper was in response to the BGC report footnote. Perhaps it was seeing it in the new gTLD context when the BGC rec specifically referred to existing gTLDs? In any event, I do remember it. I don't remember discussing it in SF, though. (I'm sure you raised it; I just don't remember it.) Would someone from policy staff please let us know that the current status of this paper is? Still discussion draft? Thanks. K ________________________________ From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:05 PM To: Rosette, Kristina; 'council@gnso.icann.org' Subject: RE: Did we receive a briefing paper on the process for amendments to sTLD charters? Kristina, A paper was posted on February 21, 2011 (http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/explantory-memo-community-change-re...); which was heavily objected to on a number of grounds by the RySG. In our view, there were a number of flawed assumptions in there as well as too heavy a hand by ICANN. I am not sure if someone from staff forwarded this to you, so I thought I would and send it to the Council. At a few of the meetings, I brought this up at the council level (in San Francisco in particular), but the Council did not seem interested in taking it up at the time (or maybe they weren't paying attention :)) Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:48 AM To: 'council@gnso.icann.org' Subject: [council] Did we receive a briefing paper on the process for amendments to sTLD charters? All, I was just reading the BGC's December 9, 2010 recommendation on the .jobs Charter Compliance Coalition reconsideration request and came across this footnote on page 12: 4 The BGC also thinks that the Board should address the need for a process to evaluate amendments that may have the effect of changing, or seeking to change, an sTLD Charter or Stated Purpose of a sponsored, restricted or community-based TLD. Because such a process may impact gTLDs greatly and is a policy issue, the GNSO is the natural starting point for evaluating such a process. We therefore further recommend that the Board direct the CEO to create a briefing paper for the GNSO to consider on this matter, and for the GNSO to determine whether a policy development process should be commenced. I don't recall receiving any such briefing paper. Did we receive one? If so, would the relevant staff person mind sending me a copy of it? Thanks! K
participants (2)
-
Neuman, Jeff -
Rosette, Kristina