As a heads up, the first draft of the GAC Barcelona communique contains the following advice: 1. Based on the CCWG Accountability WS2 work, another multistakeholder process ("of some kind") should be started to study the issue of jurisdiction (as GAC can't reach consensus on approving WS2 because of that issue) 2. With regards to two-character country codes on second level, the Board is asked to explain how/if it complies with previous GAC Advice 3. On IGO-INGO curative rights, the Board is asked to facilitate a dialogue between GNSO and GAC to resolve outstanding issues (in the same way as was successfully done in the case of the Red Cross names) There will probably also be a statement on .amazon Julf
Thanks Julf, very helpful. Donna Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 23, 2018, at 5:57 PM, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
As a heads up, the first draft of the GAC Barcelona communique contains the following advice:
1. Based on the CCWG Accountability WS2 work, another multistakeholder process ("of some kind") should be started to study the issue of jurisdiction (as GAC can't reach consensus on approving WS2 because of that issue)
2. With regards to two-character country codes on second level, the Board is asked to explain how/if it complies with previous GAC Advice
3. On IGO-INGO curative rights, the Board is asked to facilitate a dialogue between GNSO and GAC to resolve outstanding issues (in the same way as was successfully done in the case of the Red Cross names)
There will probably also be a statement on .amazon
Julf
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li...
participants (2)
-
Austin, Donna -
Johan Helsingius