questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO
Here are the questions I wrote down during our meeting today. These were done on the fly some will obviously need some work. Please correct/amend/refine as necessary. There is some urgency for the GAC questions as that is tomorrow and it would be good if we could some questions to the GAC asap. Thanks, Stéphane For the ccNSO - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - How to deal with CWGs and should the recommendations For the GAC - Do we want to have a formal group formed between GAC and GNSO to discuss and - Should we work on finding a new liaison from the GAC to the GNSO ? - CWGs, what is the GAC's view on these and how should their recommendations be processed?
Hi - some suggestions on a couple of the questions: ccNSO - on the 2nd question (what they are working on), we can add a supplementary question along the lines of "and which of these projects do they anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)"? GAC - on the CWG question, we can refer to the ATRT recs Liz mentioned (#12 & #13), e.g. "how can the GNSO assist the GAC and the Board to implement those recs (i.e. engaging the GAC earlier in the policy development process, and ensuring that the GAC is fully informed as to the policy agenda at ICANN)? Would CWGs be useful in this regard? What is the GAC's views on CWGs and how would the GAC propose such groups' recommendations be processed?" Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To:"council@gnso.icann.org GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 3/12/2011 5:48 PM Subject: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO Here are the questions I wrote down during our meeting today. These were done on the fly some will obviously need some work. Please correct/amend/refine as necessary. There is some urgency for the GAC questions as that is tomorrow and it would be good if we could some questions to the GAC asap. Thanks, Stéphane For the ccNSO - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - How to deal with CWGs and should the recommendations For the GAC - Do we want to have a formal group formed between GAC and GNSO to discuss and - Should we work on finding a new liaison from the GAC to the GNSO ? - CWGs, what is the GAC's view on these and how should their recommendations be processed?
participants (2)
-
Mary.Wong＠law.unh.edu -
Stéphane Van Gelder