Hi Chuck, I have no problem adding 'by 27 June' to the end of the last sentence as this is the date indicated in the plan, though I thought the last sentence had already covered it by stating. "... request(s) that constituencies and nomcom appointees begin the task of naming representatives to serve in the two Standing Committees as defined in the Top Level Plan. Or are you suggesting anther change I am not understanding? thanks a. On 22 Jun 2008, at 07:41, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

Avri,

It looks good to me except it might be helpful to request that constituencies identify one member each foe each of the two steering committees by the Council meeting on 25 June if possible.

Chuck

Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)

-----Original Message----- From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@psg.com] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 05:27 PM Eastern Standard Time To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed Motion for 25 June on GNSO "Improvments"

Hi

Based on my understanding of the results of today's meeting, I have drafted the following motion.

thanks

a.

Motion: Avri Doria Second:

Whereas it is expected that ICANN Board of Directors will adopt recommendations for GNSO "Improvements" and in response to Board resolution 2008.02.15.03 that directed the ICANN Staff in consultation with GNSO to develop an implementation plan

And whereas such a plan was developed by the Planning Team composed of staff and GNSO members working jointly and in cooperation,

Therefore:

The GSNO Council approves the Framework defined in GNSO Improvements – Top Level Plan of 21 June 2008 prepared by the GNSO Improvements Planning Team as documented in (url) and request that constituencies and nomcom appointees begin the task of naming representatives to serve in the two Standing Committees as defined in the Top Level Plan.