RE: [council] For your review - GNSO Review of GAC Communique Hyderabad
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6a4888e4c863093f3ee140d6274f8a16.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
12 Dec
12 Dec
3:02 p.m.
New subject: For your review - GNSO Review of GAC Communique Hyderabad
On Dec 12, 2016, at 8:46 PM, policy@paulmcgrady.com wrote:
Thanks Rubens. The use of "best practices" was in the original version that contracted parties sent around - I was pretty proud that I was able to keep it in!
I know that, but I trace the origins of this to some ICANN propositions in the early days of the Spec 11 discussion.
Regarding your other comment, I guess I do't know where that leaves us since at least the GAC seems to know what abuses are. How do we solve this?
If elected officials in a city, state or country try to revoke the Law of Gravity, how citizens should deal with it ? Rubens
2766
Age (days ago)
2766
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
policy@paulmcgrady.com
-
Rubens Kuhl