Proposed motion on an amendement regarding the outcome of the PDP on clarification of Transfer Denial Reasons
Dear all, Following the public comments regarding the new proposed texts for transfer denial reasons #8 and #9 and the subsequent discussion on this list, Chuck asked me to draft a motion for an amendment on this, for consideration on the call 16 October. Please find the draft motion below - it is also on the wiki. Very best regards Olof ---------------------- Motion on Amendment to Council Resolution on the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Denial Definitions Policy Development Process (PDP) Moved: Chuck Gomes Seconded: Whereas: * On 4 September 2008, the GNSO Council adopted a Recommendation concluding a Policy Development Process (PDP) to clarify four of the nine transfer denial reasons enumerated in the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy; * The ensuing public comment period rendered a comment identifying a possibility to misinterpret a part of the proposed text for Denial Reason #9, notably the words "or transfer to the Registrar of Record"; * The GNSO Council, in consultation with members of the drafting group for this PDP, has found it appropriate to delete these words from the proposed text for Denial Reason #9; Resolved: 1. That Denial reason #9 in which the current text reads: A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs). Be amended to read: A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs). "Transferred" shall only mean that an inter-registrar transfer has occurred in accordance with the procedures of this policy.
Thanks Olof. Looks good to me. Chuck ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:19 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed motion on an amendement regarding the outcome of the PDP on clarification of Transfer Denial Reasons Dear all, Following the public comments regarding the new proposed texts for transfer denial reasons #8 and #9 and the subsequent discussion on this list, Chuck asked me to draft a motion for an amendment on this, for consideration on the call 16 October. Please find the draft motion below - it is also on the wiki. Very best regards Olof ---------------------- Motion on Amendment to Council Resolution on the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Denial Definitions Policy Development Process (PDP) Moved: Chuck Gomes Seconded: Whereas: * On 4 September 2008, the GNSO Council adopted a Recommendation concluding a Policy Development Process (PDP) to clarify four of the nine transfer denial reasons enumerated in the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy; * The ensuing public comment period rendered a comment identifying a possibility to misinterpret a part of the proposed text for Denial Reason #9, notably the words "or transfer to the Registrar of Record"; * The GNSO Council, in consultation with members of the drafting group for this PDP, has found it appropriate to delete these words from the proposed text for Denial Reason #9; Resolved: 1. That Denial reason #9 in which the current text reads: A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs). Be amended to read: A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs). "Transferred" shall only mean that an inter-registrar transfer has occurred in accordance with the procedures of this policy.
participants (2)
-
Gomes, Chuck -
Olof Nordling