Thanks Tim. I had already planned an agenda item for the IRTP-B final report for our June 9 meeting but was unsure whether we'd get a motion for this. I have updated the agenda item with a reference to your motion, for discussion only at this stage. The new version of the agenda will be posted by Glen shortly. Stéphane Le 2 juin 2011 à 20:59, tim@godaddy.com a écrit :

No. I Just want to open discussion on it.

Tim

------Original Message------ From: Stéphane Van Gelder To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations Sent: Jun 2, 2011 1:56 PM

Thanks Tim.

So just to be clear, you are NOT making this motion for our June 9 meeting?

Stéphane

Le 1 juin 2011 à 23:13, Tim Ruiz a écrit :

...

A proposed motion for the final report and recommendations of the IRTP-B WG is attached in both doc and txt formats.

Thanks to Marika for putting this together. I made a few edits because my personal opinion is that recommendations 8 and 9 are not fully baked yet. While I have faith in Staff's ability to do what is asked of it in those two recommendations, I do not feel it is appropriate. There are policy aspects of those two recommendations that are yet unaddressed. Using an implementation plan to flesh them out is not appropriate or fair to either the community or to Staff.

As Liaison to this WG I should have caught that sooner, but I am not sure the WG would have gotten any further with them either way. As a result I have left them mentioned in Resolve(D) but have not yet had time to ocnsider how to frame them.

In any event, the Council has not had opportunity to discuss the report so voting on this motion during the meeting on the 9th is not practical. The moton is being presented here to get it on the agenda for discussion purposes only. I do believe we could be able to vote on it as early as Singapore.

Thanks, Tim <Motion-IRTP-PartB-Final-Report-and-Recommendations.doc><Motion-IRTP-PartB-Final-Report-and-Recommendations.txt>