FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
Forwarded From: Bart Boswinkel Hi Glen, Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward it to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well? The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook. Kind regards, Bart
Glen, Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov. In the meantime, in my opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me. Does anyone think differently? Chuck ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG Forwarded From: Bart Boswinkel Hi Glen, Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward it to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well? The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook. Kind regards, Bart
Maybe I¹m not understanding the proposed change. Does adding ³Upon adoption of either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development process on the introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs² not mean that the JIG effectively closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts? Stéphane Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@verisign.com> a écrit :
Glen,
Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov. In the meantime, in my opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me. Does anyone think differently?
Chuck
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
Forwarded From: Bart Boswinkel
Hi Glen, Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward it to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well? The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook. Kind regards, Bart
Edmon, It would be helpful if you commented on this. Chuck _____ From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:13 AM To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG Maybe Im not understanding the proposed change. Does adding Upon adoption of either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development process on the introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs not mean that the JIG effectively closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts? Stéphane Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@verisign.com> a écrit : Glen, Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov. In the meantime, in my opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me. Does anyone think differently? Chuck _____ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG Forwarded From: Bart Boswinkel Hi Glen, Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward it to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well? The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook. Kind regards, Bart
Hi Stéphane, The wording is chosen to mean when the ccpdp process and not the IDN ccTLD Fast Track process. Hope this clarifies the issue. Edmon From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:13 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG Maybe I’m not understanding the proposed change. Does adding “Upon adoption of either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development process on the introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs” not mean that the JIG effectively closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts? Stéphane Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@verisign.com> a écrit : Glen, Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov. In the meantime, in my opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me. Does anyone think differently? Chuck _____ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG Forwarded From: Bart Boswinkel Hi Glen, Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward it to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well? The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook. Kind regards, Bart
Hi Edmon, Thanks for that. To be honest, I think it may need an extra sentence of context to ensure there are no misunderstandings. I¹m sure many people probably think the fast-track is the PDP process. It may be worth explaining that the fast-track is a way to get some IDN ccTLDs out there before the PDP process is completed. Stéphane Le 02/11/09 09:35, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@registry.asia> a écrit :
Hi Stéphane,
The wording is chosen to mean when the ccpdp process and not the IDN ccTLD Fast Track process. Hope this clarifies the issue.
Edmon
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:13 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
Maybe I¹m not understanding the proposed change. Does adding ³Upon adoption of either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development process on the introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs² not mean that the JIG effectively closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts?
Stéphane
Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@verisign.com> a écrit : Glen,
Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov. In the meantime, in my opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me. Does anyone think differently?
Chuck
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
Forwarded From: Bart Boswinkel
Hi Glen, Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward it to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well? The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook. Kind regards, Bart
participants (4)
-
Edmon Chung -
Glen de Saint Géry -
Gomes, Chuck -
Stéphane Van Gelder