RE: [council] Action item for the SCI
Wolf and Joy, I actually do not like the way this is positioned. We should not be asking the question of whether what we did at the meeting on the 20th was in line with the Operating Procedures, but rather should consider the notion separate and apart from the substance of the IOC motion. The question should simply be "should there be any restrictions on resubmitting motions that previously appeared before the Council? If so, what should those restrictions be and are there any exceptions? I think it is that simple. I am not currently on the SCI, but I would like to be involved in this question so I would ask if I can now be included on that mailing list. Thanks. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Sent from iPad. Please excuse any typos. -----Original Message----- From: KnobenW@telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 05:57 PM Eastern Standard Time To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Action item for the SCI All, Following the debate on resubmitting a defeated motion to the council, Joy and I drafted the council's request for the SCI (see attached). I've already introduced the item to the SCI, and it has been taken to the SCI's agenda. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Thanks Jeff, I'll forward your request to the SCI chair Ron Andruff. He'll refer back to you once decided. Season's Greetings Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us] Gesendet: Samstag, 22. Dezember 2012 02:03 An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; 'council@gnso.icann.org' Betreff: RE: [council] Action item for the SCI Wolf and Joy, I actually do not like the way this is positioned. We should not be asking the question of whether what we did at the meeting on the 20th was in line with the Operating Procedures, but rather should consider the notion separate and apart from the substance of the IOC motion. The question should simply be "should there be any restrictions on resubmitting motions that previously appeared before the Council? If so, what should those restrictions be and are there any exceptions? I think it is that simple. I am not currently on the SCI, but I would like to be involved in this question so I would ask if I can now be included on that mailing list. Thanks. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Sent from iPad. Please excuse any typos. -----Original Message----- From: KnobenW@telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 05:57 PM Eastern Standard Time To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Action item for the SCI All, Following the debate on resubmitting a defeated motion to the council, Joy and I drafted the council's request for the SCI (see attached). I've already introduced the item to the SCI, and it has been taken to the SCI's agenda. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
Jeff you will be added to the list. Glen Envoyé de mon iPhone Le 22 déc. 2012 à 02:03, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
Wolf and Joy,
I actually do not like the way this is positioned. We should not be asking the question of whether what we did at the meeting on the 20th was in line with the Operating Procedures, but rather should consider the notion separate and apart from the substance of the IOC motion. The question should simply be "should there be any restrictions on resubmitting motions that previously appeared before the Council? If so, what should those restrictions be and are there any exceptions?
I think it is that simple.
I am not currently on the SCI, but I would like to be involved in this question so I would ask if I can now be included on that mailing list.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Sent from iPad. Please excuse any typos.
-----Original Message----- From: KnobenW@telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 05:57 PM Eastern Standard Time To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Action item for the SCI
All,
Following the debate on resubmitting a defeated motion to the council, Joy and I drafted the council's request for the SCI (see attached). I've already introduced the item to the SCI, and it has been taken to the SCI's agenda.
Best regards Wolf-Ulrich
participants (3)
-
Glen de Saint Géry -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Neuman, Jeff