Forwarded On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff Just for clarification (and please post to the Council list), the Work Team meeting is not being planned until all of the deadlines on the STI work are to have expired. Thanks. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:07 AM To: 'Marika Konings'; 'Gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org'; GNSO Council Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting I copy the Council list, as we need to begin prioritizing all the various work before us, immediately. In my view, this Work Team meeting should not be planned unless the Council decides it is a bigger priority for a face to face meeting than all of our other priorities, in particular the STI response to the Board, the RAP-WG, the RAA drafting team, etc. Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 738-8087<http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&referer=http://rodenbaugh.com/contact> http://rodenbaugh.com<http://rodenbaugh.com/> From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:43 PM To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting Dear All, As discussed during our meeting, in order to move the proposal for a face to face meeting forward, I'll be developing a workplan outlining the objectives and expected deliverables of such a meeting in order to obtain internal approval. As discussed, the idea would be to provide travel funding for one active WT representative from each constituency / stakeholdergroup or AC/SO. Remote participation will be arranged for those that will not be able to attend in person. To move this forward and complete this plan, I would like to request the following information: 1. In order to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective meeting venue and have an indication of the number of participants that will require funding, could you please send me the name of the proposed funded representative from your constituency / stakeholdergroup / AC/SO and the location from where this person will be travelling 2. Please complete the following doodle (see http://www.doodle.com/u6ta33ik4r5mk52g) so we can try to find a meeting date that is most convenient to all. Please note that the idea is to have a 1,5 - 2 day meeting. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Best regards, Marika