RES: WPM Council Resolution Amendment
Dear All, According to the results of our yesterday exercise I would like to make the following amendment to the Council Resolution on Work Prioritization. Jaime Wagner ISPs Representative CGI (Brazilian Internet Steering Commitee) j@bwagner.com.br <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> jaime <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> @cgi.br <mailto:jaime@cgi.br> +55(51)8126-0916 De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org] Em nome de Ken Bour Enviada em: domingo, 20 de junho de 2010 12:14 Para: gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org Assunto: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization) WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a resolution <https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions> and timeline to conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of procedures (proposed Chapter <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf> 6 and ANNEX) recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first three of which have been completed as follows: 1) Step 1: ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO Council a recommended Work <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pd f> Prioritization Project List (v1.0), including a Cover <http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-proje ct-list-30apr10-en.pdf> Letter, on 30 April 2010 [Council <http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/> approved on 20 May 2010] 2) Step 2: Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1) on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3; 3) Step 3: The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects (Note: the IDNF project was determined by the Council to be "Ineligible"); NOW THEREFORE, BE IT: RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.
Thanks Jaime, I accept this amendment as friendly. Regards Olga 2010/6/21 Jaime Plug In <jaime@corp.plugin.com.br>
Dear All,
According to the results of our yesterday exercise I would like to make the following amendment to the Council Resolution on Work Prioritization.
Jaime Wagner
ISPs Representative
CGI (Brazilian Internet Steering Commitee) j@bwagner.com.br <jaime@corp.plugin.com.br>
jaime <jaime@corp.plugin.com.br>@cgi.br <jaime@cgi.br> +55(51)8126-0916
*De:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org] *Em nome de *Ken Bour *Enviada em:* domingo, 20 de junho de 2010 12:14 *Para:* gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org *Assunto:* [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment
*GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization) * WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a resolution and timeline<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>to conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and ANNEX<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf>) recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); **
WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first three of which have been completed as follows:
1) Step 1: ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project List<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pdf> (v1.0), including a Cover Letter<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-projec...>, on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20 May 2010<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/> ]
2) Step 2: Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1) on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3;
3) Step 3: The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects (Note: the IDNF project was determined by the Council to be “Ineligible”);
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.
I second it as friendly. Regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Olga Cavalli Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juni 2010 13:53 An: Jaime Plug In Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; Ken Bour Betreff: Re: [council] RES: WPM Council Resolution Amendment Thanks Jaime, I accept this amendment as friendly. Regards Olga 2010/6/21 Jaime Plug In <jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> Dear All, According to the results of our yesterday exercise I would like to make the following amendment to the Council Resolution on Work Prioritization. Jaime Wagner ISPs Representative CGI (Brazilian Internet Steering Commitee) j@bwagner.com.br <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> jaime <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> @cgi.br <mailto:jaime@cgi.br> +55(51)8126-0916 De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org] Em nome de Ken Bour Enviada em: domingo, 20 de junho de 2010 12:14 Para: gnso-wpm-dt@icann.org Assunto: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization) WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a resolution and timeline <https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions> to conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and ANNEX <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf> ) recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first three of which have been completed as follows: 1) Step 1: ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project List <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-e n.pdf> (v1.0), including a Cover Letter <http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-p roject-list-30apr10-en.pdf> , on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20 May 2010 <http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/> ] 2) Step 2: Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1) on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3; 3) Step 3: The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects (Note: the IDNF project was determined by the Council to be "Ineligible"); NOW THEREFORE, BE IT: RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.
participants (3)
-
Jaime Plug In -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Olga Cavalli