Re: [council] [Epdp-dt] Unified Access Model
On 27-06-18 17:02, Johan Helsingius wrote:
Looking forward to the GAC/Board meeting. Will report back.
Again apologies for the rather unpolished and unstructured notes, but wanted to get them to you promptly.
From the GAC / board discussion on GDPR:
- Does the board plan adjustments to temp spec? Göran confirmed the discussion should happen in the GNSO EPGP. Chris Disspain stated that the board doesn't plan any changes, but doesn't rule it out. - Unfied Access Model Org will seek guidance from DPAs based on model proposed by icann.org. progress depends on if org gets advice from DPAs, and what the advice is - Coordination of the different threads and efforts Chris Disspain sees EPDP and access model as parallel efforts, but "there is a framework for coordination", the board will assess the situation each 90 days as it decides about renewing temporary specification, closely affiliating with GNSO and GAC. Org is eagerly waiting for budget input from GNSO On a question on GAC participation/liaison with the EPDP, Manal did mention the wish for 5 members, and mentioned desire for equal / balanced representation. There was concern expressed about scope (wanting access and accreditation included), but Chris Disspain stated that from the point of timing, it might be better to do access separately, perhaps as another temporary specification (that can then later be made the subject of a PDP / EPDP).
What about .Amazon? On June 27, 2018 11:20:56 AM EST, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
On 27-06-18 17:02, Johan Helsingius wrote:
Looking forward to the GAC/Board meeting. Will report back.
Again apologies for the rather unpolished and unstructured notes, but wanted to get them to you promptly.
From the GAC / board discussion on GDPR:
- Does the board plan adjustments to temp spec?
Göran confirmed the discussion should happen in the GNSO EPGP. Chris Disspain stated that the board doesn't plan any changes, but doesn't rule it out.
- Unfied Access Model
Org will seek guidance from DPAs based on model proposed by icann.org. progress depends on if org gets advice from DPAs, and what the advice is
- Coordination of the different threads and efforts
Chris Disspain sees EPDP and access model as parallel efforts, but "there is a framework for coordination", the board will assess the situation each 90 days as it decides about renewing temporary specification, closely affiliating with GNSO and GAC. Org is eagerly waiting for budget input from GNSO
On a question on GAC participation/liaison with the EPDP, Manal did mention the wish for 5 members, and mentioned desire for equal / balanced representation. There was concern expressed about scope (wanting access and accreditation included), but Chris Disspain stated that from the point of timing, it might be better to do access separately, perhaps as another temporary specification (that can then later be made the subject of a PDP / EPDP).
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
participants (2)
-
Carlos Raul Gutierrez -
Johan Helsingius