Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget
Dear all, On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget. We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council. With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline
Thank you, Ayden, and thanks to all the SCBO contributors. All, please make this a priority and provide any comments to Ayden by the end of this week. Best, Keith
On Nov 7, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget.
We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council.
With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
<FY20 IANA-PTI Proposed OpPlan Budget - GNSO Draft Comments_v0.2.docx> _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Dear all, Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget.
We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council.
With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
Thanks for the SCBO's efforts here. The RrSG has no objections or additional edits. Darcy On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:09 AM Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget.
We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council.
With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Thanks Ayden. I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks! Best, Paul From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Dear all, Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget. We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council. With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.
Thanks for flagging this, Paul. I will bring this to the attention of the SCBO and revert back shortly. Ayden
On 9 Nov 2018, at 17:04, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady@winston.com> wrote:
Thanks Ayden.
I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks!
Best, Paul
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget
Dear all,
Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget.
We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council.
With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
--------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.
Dear all, Please find attached a proposed revision to the Council's comment on the FY20 IANA/PTI Budget. We should change this sentence: The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. To read: The GNSO Council notes that one of our current policy development activities does potentially intersect with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group is currently developing Policy that may ultimately instruct IANA to place new TLDs into the root. However, it is not anticipated that delegation would occur in FY20. If there are any concerns with the attached comment being submitted today, can you please advise so on the mailing list by 18:00 UTC today. Thank you. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, 9 November 2018 17:04, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady@winston.com> wrote:
Thanks Ayden.
I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks!
Best, Paul
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget
Dear all,
Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget.
We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council.
With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Ayden Férdeline
--------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.
Thanks Ayden. I think it would be a useful amendment to make despite the timeline going beyond FY20. Regards, Philippe -------- Message d'origine -------- De : Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Date : 12/11/2018 13:01 (GMT+01:00) À : "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady@winston.com> Cc : GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Objet : Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Dear all, Please find attached a proposed revision to the Council's comment on the FY20 IANA/PTI Budget. We should change this sentence: The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. To read: The GNSO Council notes that one of our current policy development activities does potentially intersect with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group is currently developing Policy that may ultimately instruct IANA to place new TLDs into the root. However, it is not anticipated that delegation would occur in FY20. If there are any concerns with the attached comment being submitted today, can you please advise so on the mailing list by 18:00 UTC today. Thank you. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, 9 November 2018 17:04, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady@winston.com> wrote: Thanks Ayden. I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks! Best, Paul From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Dear all, Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget. We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council. With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Thanks Ayden. This change looks good to me. Best, Paul Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, Please find attached a proposed revision to the Council's comment on the FY20 IANA/PTI Budget. We should change this sentence: The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. To read: The GNSO Council notes that one of our current policy development activities does potentially intersect with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group is currently developing Policy that may ultimately instruct IANA to place new TLDs into the root. However, it is not anticipated that delegation would occur in FY20. If there are any concerns with the attached comment being submitted today, can you please advise so on the mailing list by 18:00 UTC today. Thank you. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, 9 November 2018 17:04, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady@winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady@winston.com>> wrote: Thanks Ayden. I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks! Best, Paul From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Dear all, Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget. We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council. With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations. <FY20 IANA-PTI Proposed OpPlan Budget - GNSO Draft Comments_v0.4 - AF edits.docx>
Thanks from us too Ayden - the BC supports. Marie -----Original Message----- From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of McGrady, Paul D. Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 3:34 PM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Thanks Ayden. This change looks good to me. Best, Paul Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, Please find attached a proposed revision to the Council's comment on the FY20 IANA/PTI Budget. We should change this sentence: The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. To read: The GNSO Council notes that one of our current policy development activities does potentially intersect with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group is currently developing Policy that may ultimately instruct IANA to place new TLDs into the root. However, it is not anticipated that delegation would occur in FY20. If there are any concerns with the attached comment being submitted today, can you please advise so on the mailing list by 18:00 UTC today. Thank you. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, 9 November 2018 17:04, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady@winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady@winston.com>> wrote: Thanks Ayden. I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks! Best, Paul From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Dear all, Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget. We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council. With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations. <FY20 IANA-PTI Proposed OpPlan Budget - GNSO Draft Comments_v0.4 - AF edits.docx> _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Dear Ayden and colleagues, Thanks to Ayden for leading this effort. The revised sentence makes sense but it is my understanding that after the stewardship transition, ICANN continues to be the IANA functions operators while PTI is contracted to serve as the operator for the IANA naming function. Therefore, it seems to me the reference to IANA should be to PTI. I also propose two other minor edits: Policy be changed to policy; TLDs be changed to gTLDs: "The GNSO Council notes that one of our current policy development activities does potentially intersect with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group is currently developing Ppolicy that may ultimately instruct IANA PTI to place new gTLDs into the root. However, it is not anticipated that delegation would occur in FY20." Kind regards, Pam ------------------------------------------------------------------ Sender:Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 02:30 To:"McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady@winston.com>; "Ayden Férdeline" <icann@ferdeline.com> Cc:GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject:Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Thanks from us too Ayden - the BC supports. Marie -----Original Message----- From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of McGrady, Paul D. Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 3:34 PM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Thanks Ayden. This change looks good to me. Best, Paul Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, Please find attached a proposed revision to the Council's comment on the FY20 IANA/PTI Budget. We should change this sentence: The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. To read: The GNSO Council notes that one of our current policy development activities does potentially intersect with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group is currently developing Policy that may ultimately instruct IANA to place new TLDs into the root. However, it is not anticipated that delegation would occur in FY20. If there are any concerns with the attached comment being submitted today, can you please advise so on the mailing list by 18:00 UTC today. Thank you. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, 9 November 2018 17:04, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady@winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady@winston.com>> wrote: Thanks Ayden. I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks! Best, Paul From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM To: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget Dear all, Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: Dear all, On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget. We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council. With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline ________________________________ The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations. <FY20 IANA-PTI Proposed OpPlan Budget - GNSO Draft Comments_v0.4 - AF edits.docx> _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
participants (7)
-
Ayden Férdeline -
Darcy Southwell -
Drazek, Keith -
Marie Pattullo -
McGrady, Paul D. -
Pam Little -
philippe.fouquart＠orange.com