RE: [council] Joint Meeting Topics for Brussels
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
GAC/GNSO - Are we picking one, or are they suggesting we discuss them all if time permits? If the latter, is the list in priority order? And either way, it would be helpful if they could be more specific on AoC, RAA, and IDN ccPDP. Those very broad topics. We could spend hours on any one of them. ccNSO/GNSO - Agree. Numerous stakeholders have expressed concerned about how involved ICANN wants to get with this. Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting - Will reply to this on the other thread. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Joint Meeting Topics for Brussels From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Thu, May 20, 2010 7:18 pm To: "GNSO Council" <council@gnso.icann.org> It is time for us to start thinking about discussion topics for our three regular joint meetings in Brussels: 1) GAC/GNSO meeting; 2) Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting; and 3) ccNSO/GNSO meeting. To get discussion going, I listed some ideas below. GAC/GNSO meeting Janis suggested the following with my comments in parentheses: · DAG 4, including morality and public order (could be a lively discussion) · AoC, including A&T RT and next reviews · RAA (I believe that this is one where there is common interest in discussing) · IDN ccPDP (I don’t think this is very useful from a GNSO point of view, but maybe I am missing something) Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting · There are rumblings that there are some on the Board who think this meeting has outlived its usefulness; in light of that, it might be useful to discuss the value or lack of value from both the GNSO and Board/Staff perspective. ccNSO/GNSO meeting · DNS-CERT Please comment on the above and feel free to suggest new topics. I promised Janis and Chris I would get back to them. Thanks, Chuck
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b90048f2bfa1fb043625de7955dfdda6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Please see below Tim. Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 10:26 AM To: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] Joint Meeting Topics for Brussels
GAC/GNSO - Are we picking one, or are they suggesting we discuss them all if time permits? [Gomes, Chuck] These were just Janis's ideas. There will not be near enough time to discuss them all.
If the latter, is the list in priority order? [Gomes, Chuck] No
And either way, it would be helpful if they could be more specific on AoC, RAA, and IDN ccPDP. Those very broad topics. We could spend hours on any one of them. [Gomes, Chuck] Agree. We can narrow them down. I think Janis was just suggesting possible topics that we could choose from.
ccNSO/GNSO - Agree. Numerous stakeholders have expressed concerned about how involved ICANN wants to get with this.
Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting - Will reply to this on the other thread.
Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Joint Meeting Topics for Brussels From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Thu, May 20, 2010 7:18 pm To: "GNSO Council" <council@gnso.icann.org>
It is time for us to start thinking about discussion topics for our three regular joint meetings in Brussels: 1) GAC/GNSO meeting; 2) Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting; and 3) ccNSO/GNSO meeting. To get discussion going, I listed some ideas below. GAC/GNSO meeting Janis suggested the following with my comments in parentheses: · DAG 4, including morality and public order (could be a lively discussion) · AoC, including A&T RT and next reviews · RAA (I believe that this is one where there is common interest in discussing) · IDN ccPDP (I don’t think this is very useful from a GNSO point of view, but maybe I am missing something)
Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting · There are rumblings that there are some on the Board who think this meeting has outlived its usefulness; in light of that, it might be useful to discuss the value or lack of value from both the GNSO and Board/Staff perspective.
ccNSO/GNSO meeting · DNS-CERT
Please comment on the above and feel free to suggest new topics. I promised Janis and Chris I would get back to them. Thanks, Chuck
participants (2)
-
Gomes, Chuck
-
Tim Ruiz