GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues
Hi, I wanted to remind us of one thing. The deadline for comments to the ccNSO PDP was extended to 22 Feb, in part to give the GNSO time to complete its responses. I recommend that we resolve our 3 issues as soon as possible so that we can do a 48 last call on the list in time to submit the response on time for the deadline - week Friday. As part of this effort, I also propose that the current issues as discussed this morning are the only issues left to discuss. I have attached the notes i used during the meeting. thanks a.
I think #9 is resolved unless others feel uncomfortable. I am ok to leave the wording as the original (without any amendments. Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:12 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues
Hi,
I wanted to remind us of one thing.
The deadline for comments to the ccNSO PDP was extended to 22 Feb, in part to give the GNSO time to complete its responses.
I recommend that we resolve our 3 issues as soon as possible so that we can do a 48 last call on the list in time to submit the response on time for the deadline - week Friday.
As part of this effort, I also propose that the current issues as discussed this morning are the only issues left to discuss. I have attached the notes i used during the meeting.
thanks a.
I agree Avri Olga 2008/2/13, Avri Doria <avri@psg.com>:
does anyone disagree?
a.
On 13 Feb 2008, at 16:51, Edmon Chung wrote:
I think #9 is resolved unless others feel uncomfortable. I am ok to leave the wording as the original (without any amendments. Edmon
participants (3)
-
Avri Doria -
Edmon Chung -
Olga Cavalli