Hi, I agree as well. In the absence of any objections, I don’t see why we can’t send this to the board without having to vote on it. Asking the Board to send this to the PPSAI IRT seems like a solid idea to me. Thanks. Amr

On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:47 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1@TOAST.NET> wrote:

Hi James,

I completely support both the letter and

ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

your suggestion thereof. This is very time sensitive and will the rules presumably becoming live on December 1st (am I wrong here?) we're already playing catch up.

A big thanks to Darcy for your hard work on this. This is a very important issue and I'm grateful for your leadership on it.

Kind Regards,

Ed Morris

From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 AM To: "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell@endurance.com>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.

Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and direction by the ICANN Board.

Question for the Council: are there any questions or concerns on this topic, or is this relatively non-controversial? If the latter, then I would ask that we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

Interested in hearing your thoughts.

Thanks—

J.

From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41 To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

All,

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication. You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff. This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting.

Best, Darcy __________ Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

<Attachment 1>

Thanks, Erika, Amr & Ed. Hoping to hear from others as well, but understanding it’s a holiday week in the US and folks may be focused on more important things. Thanks— J. From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 15:53 To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Re: [council] Re: [council] [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy James - I support that we proceed and submit the letter without a formal motion. Cheers, Erika Erika Mann - erika@erikamnn.com<mailto:erika@erikamnn.com> - +32 498 12 13 54 On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org<mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org>> wrote: Hi, I agree as well. In the absence of any objections, I don’t see why we can’t send this to the board without having to vote on it. Asking the Board to send this to the PPSAI IRT seems like a solid idea to me. Thanks. Amr

On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:47 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1@TOAST.NET<mailto:egmorris1@TOAST.NET>> wrote:

Hi James,

I completely support both the letter and

ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

your suggestion thereof. This is very time sensitive and will the rules presumably becoming live on December 1st (am I wrong here?) we're already playing catch up.

A big thanks to Darcy for your hard work on this. This is a very important issue and I'm grateful for your leadership on it.

Kind Regards,

Ed Morris

From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 AM To: "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell@endurance.com<mailto:darcy.southwell@endurance.com>>, "council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.

Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and direction by the ICANN Board.

Question for the Council: are there any questions or concerns on this topic, or is this relatively non-controversial? If the latter, then I would ask that we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

Interested in hearing your thoughts.

Thanks—

J.

From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com<mailto:darcy.southwell@endurance.com>> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41 To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

All,

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication. You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff. This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting.

Best, Darcy __________ Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305<tel:%2B1%20503-453-7305> │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

<Attachment 1>

Paul or I will provide input ASAP first thing next week. Best wishes, Heather ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:08:23 AM To: Amr Elsadr; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Re: [council] Re: [council] [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy Totally agree. Stephanie Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network. Original Message From: Amr Elsadr Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:50 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Re: [council] [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy Hi, I agree as well. In the absence of any objections, I don’t see why we can’t send this to the board without having to vote on it. Asking the Board to send this to the PPSAI IRT seems like a solid idea to me. Thanks. Amr

On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:47 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1@TOAST.NET> wrote:

Hi James,

I completely support both the letter and

ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

your suggestion thereof. This is very time sensitive and will the rules presumably becoming live on December 1st (am I wrong here?) we're already playing catch up.

A big thanks to Darcy for your hard work on this. This is a very important issue and I'm grateful for your leadership on it.

Kind Regards,

Ed Morris

From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 AM To: "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell@endurance.com>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.

Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and direction by the ICANN Board.

Question for the Council: are there any questions or concerns on this topic, or is this relatively non-controversial? If the latter, then I would ask that we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

Interested in hearing your thoughts.

Thanks—

J.

From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41 To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

All,

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication. You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff. This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting.

Best, Darcy __________ Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

<Attachment 1>

Thanks Donna. Figuring that many are out of the office this week, let’s give folks until Monday to weigh in or raise questions. Thanks— J. From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin@neustar.biz> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 17:52 To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com>, GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy Hi James Agree to proceed as you have suggested. Thanks Donna From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 7:28 PM To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com>; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion. Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and direction by the ICANN Board. Question for the Council: are there any questions or concerns on this topic, or is this relatively non-controversial? If the latter, then I would ask that we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter. Interested in hearing your thoughts. Thanks— J. From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com<mailto:darcy.southwell@endurance.com>> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41 To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy All, Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication. You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff. This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting. Best, Darcy __________ Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart [cid:Word%20Work%20File%20D.jpg]