I agree. Seems the same level and conditions as for Board members would make sense. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] Funding for travel From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@cabase.org.ar> Date: Tue, December 04, 2007 10:47 am To: "Avri Doria" <avri@psg.com>, "Council GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> In case I was not heard, I support Robin. It is time funding support be provided by ICANN. Regards Tony Harris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Avri Doria" <avri@psg.com> To: "Council GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [council] Funding for travel

Hi,

I have no issue with writing a note to Paul Twomey, but I have not yet heard form the entire council on this, not even from all of the constituencies. So before I do write a note that says the entire council is asking for something I would like to hear from others.

I will add this to the agenda under AOB. In the meantime, I am sure that Denise knows that at least part of the council thinks of this as priority. And also, I would like to ask those who have not spoke up to give some indication of how they feel about this.

Thanks

a.

On 4 dec 2007, at 00.32, Philip Sheppard wrote:

...

I agree with Robin too. This is exactly the intent. Support no less and no more than nom com. All equal in the sight of the CEO.

We hardly need more discussion on this. Council's intent is clear. Lets cut to the chase.

Avri, as our elected Chair, please e-mail Paul Twomey CEO and ask him directly for full funding for Delhi.

Philip