Re: [gnso-dow123] [Fwd: RFC 920]definition of admin and technical contacts
I would add to this that this "definition" was specific to the function of DNS registrations within the ARPA/DARPA networks. While this document has historical significance, it is long since obsolete. For the most part, the Registry and Registrar agreements now set the requirements for estabishing domain names, not RFC 920. To understand the true historical context of this document, one should also review RFC 1032 which describes the responsibilities of Domain Administrators - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1032.html The most recent set of definitions, outside of the agreements, can be found here: http://www.icann.org/gnso/transfers-tf/report-exhc-12feb03.htm Glen De Saint Géry wrote:
Kiyoshi requested that this be forwarded. Glen
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RFC 920 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:26:29 -0400 From: Kiyoshi I. Tsuru <ktsuru@bgmt.com.mx> To: 'Glen De Saint Géry' <glen@icann.org>
Dear Glen,
This is the RFC that defines admin and technical contacts
Could you possibly distribute it among the Council?
Thank you so much,
Kiyoshi
RFC 920 (RFC920)
Internet RFC/STD/FYI/BCP Archives
[ RFC Index <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/> | RFC Search <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfcsearch.html> | Usenet FAQs <http://www.faqs.org/faqs/> | Web FAQs <http://www.faqs.org/contrib/> | Documents <http://www.faqs.org/docs/> | Cities <http://www.city-data.com/> ]
*Alternate Formats:* rfc920.txt <http://www.faqs.org/ftp/rfc/rfc920.txt> | rfc920.txt.pdf <http://www.faqs.org/ftp/rfc/pdf/rfc920.txt.pdf>
Comment on RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfccomment.php?rfcnum=920>
RFC 920 - Domain requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Working Group J. Postel Request for Comments: 920 J. Reynolds ISI October 1984
Domain Requirements
Status of this Memo
This memo is a policy statement on the requirements of establishing a new domain in the ARPA-Internet and the DARPA research community. This is an official policy statement of the IAB and the DARPA. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Introduction
This memo restates and refines the requirements on establishing a Domain first described in RFC-881 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc881.html> [1]. It adds considerable detail to that discussion, and introduces the limited set of top level domains.
The Purpose of Domains
Domains are administrative entities. The purpose and expected use of domains is to divide the name management required of a central administration and assign it to sub-administrations. There are no geographical, topological, or technological constraints on a domain. The hosts in a domain need not have common hardware or software, nor even common protocols. Most of the requirements and limitations on domains are designed to ensure responsible administration.
The domain system is a tree-structured global name space that has a few top level domains. The top level domains are subdivided into second level domains. The second level domains may be subdivided into third level domains, and so on.
The administration of a domain requires controlling the assignment of names within that domain and providing access to the names and name related information (such as addresses) to users both inside and outside the domain.
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
General Purpose Domains
While the initial domain name "ARPA" arises from the history of the development of this system and environment, in the future most of the top level names will be very general categories like "government", "education", or "commercial". The motivation is to provide an organization name that is free of undesirable semantics.
After a short period of initial experimentation, all current ARPA-Internet hosts will select some domain other than ARPA for their future use. The use of ARPA as a top level domain will eventually cease.
Initial Set of Top Level Domains
The initial top level domain names are:
Temporary
ARPA = The current ARPA-Internet hosts.
Categories
GOV = Government, any government related domains meeting the second level requirements.
EDU = Education, any education related domains meeting the second level requirements.
COM = Commercial, any commercial related domains meeting the second level requirements.
MIL = Military, any military related domains meeting the second level requirements.
ORG = Organization, any other domains meeting the second level requirements.
Countries
The English two letter code (alpha-2) identifying a country according the the ISO Standard for "Codes for the Representation of Names of Countries" [5].
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
Multiorganizations
A multiorganization may be a top level domain if it is large, and is composed of other organizations; particularly if the multiorganization can not be easily classified into one of the categories and is international in scope.
Possible Examples of Domains
The following examples are fictions of the authors' creation, any similarity to the real world is coincidental.
The UC Domain
It might be that a large state wide university with, say, nine campuses and several laboratories may want to form a domain. Each campus or major off-campus laboratory might then be a subdomain, and within each subdomain, each department could be further distinguished. This university might be a second level domain in the education category.
One might see domain style names for hosts in this domain like these:
LOCUS.CS.LA.UC.EDU CCN.OAC.LA.UC.EDU ERNIE.CS.CAL.UC.EDU A.S1.LLNL.UC.EDU A.LAND.LANL.UC.EDU NMM.LBL.CAL.UC.EDU
The MIT Domain
Another large university may have many hosts using a variety of machine types, some even using several families of protocols. However, the administrators at this university may see no need for the outside world to be aware of these internal differences. This university might be a second level domain in the education category.
One might see domain style names for hosts in this domain like these:
APIARY-1.MIT.EDU BABY-BLUE.MIT.EDU CEZANNE.MIT.EDU DASH.MIT.EDU
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
MULTICS.MIT.EDU TAC.MIT.EDU XX.MIT.EDU
The CSNET Domain
There may be a consortium of universities and industry research laboratories called, say, "CSNET". This CSNET is not a network per se, but rather a computer mail exchange using a variety of protocols and network systems. Therefore, CSNET is not a network in the sense of the ARPANET, or an Ethernet, or even the ARPA-Internet, but rather a community. Yet it does, in fact, have the key property needed to form a domain; it has a responsible administration. This consortium might be large enough and might have membership that cuts across the categories in such a way that it qualifies under the "multiorganization rule" to be a top level domain.
One might see domain style names for hosts in this domain like these:
CIC.CSNET EMORY.CSNET GATECH.CSNET HP-LABS.CSNET SJ.IBM.CSNET UDEL.CSNET UWISC.CSNET
General Requirements on a Domain
There are several requirements that must be met to establish a domain. In general, it must be responsibly managed. There must be a responsible person to serve as an authoritative coordinator for domain related questions. There must be a robust domain name lookup service, it must be of at least a minimum size, and the domain must be registered with the central domain administrator (the Network Information Center (NIC) Domain Registrar).
Responsible Person:
An individual must be identified who has authority for the administration of the names within the domain, and who seriously takes on the responsibility for the behavior of the hosts in the domain, plus their interactions with hosts outside the domain. This person must have some technical expertise and the authority within the domain to see that problems are fixed.
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
If a host in a given domain somehow misbehaves in its interactions with hosts outside the domain (e.g., consistently violates protocols), the responsible person for the domain must be competent and available to receive reports of problems, take action on the reported problems, and follow through to eliminate the problems.
Domain Servers:
A robust and reliable domain server must be provided. One way of meeting this requirement is to provide at least two independent domain servers for the domain. The database can, of course, be the same. The database can be prepared and copied to each domain server. But, the servers should be in separate machines on independent power supplies, et cetera; basically as physically independent as can be. They should have no common point of failure.
Some domains may find that providing a robust domain service can most easily be done by cooperating with another domain where each domain provides an additional server for the other.
In other situations, it may be desirable for a domain to arrange for domain service to be provided by a third party, perhaps on hosts located outside the domain.
One of the difficult problems in operating a domain server is the acquisition and maintenance of the data. In this case, the data are the host names and addresses. In some environments this information changes fairly rapidly and keeping up-to-date data may be difficult. This is one motivation for sub-domains. One may wish to create sub-domains until the rate of change of the data in a sub-domain domain server database is easily managed.
In the technical language of the domain server implementation the data is divided into zones. Domains and zones are not necessarily one-to-one. It may be reasonable for two or more domains to combine their data in a single zone.
The responsible person or an identified technical assistant must understand in detail the procedures for operating a domain server, including the management of master files and zones.
The operation of a domain server should not be taken on lightly. There are some difficult problems in providing an adequate service, primarily the problems in keeping the database up to date, and keeping the service operating.
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
The concepts and implementation details of the domain server are given in RFC-882 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc882.html> [2] and RFC-883 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc883.html> [3].
Minimum Size:
The domain must be of at least a minimum size. There is no requirement to form a domain because some set of hosts is above the minimum size.
Top level domains must be specially authorized. In general, they will only be authorized for domains expected to have over 500 hosts.
The general guideline for a second level domain is that it have over 50 hosts. This is a very soft "requirement". It makes sense that any major organization, such as a university or corporation, be allowed as a second level domain -- even if it has just a few hosts.
Registration:
Top level domains must be specially authorized and registered with the NIC domain registrar.
The administrator of a level N domain must register with the registrar (or responsible person) of the level N-1 domain. This upper level authority must be satisfied that the requirements are met before authorization for the domain is granted.
The registration procedure involves answering specific questions about the prospective domain. A prototype of what the NIC Domain Registrar may ask for the registration of a second level domain is shown below. These questions may change from time to time. It is the responsibility of domain administrators to keep this information current.
The administrator of a domain is required to make sure that host and sub-domain names within that jurisdiction conform to the standard name conventions and are unique within that domain.
If sub-domains are set up, the administrator may wish to pass along some of his authority and responsibility to a sub-domain administrator. Even if sub-domains are established, the responsible person for the top-level domain is ultimately responsible for the whole tree of sub-domains and hosts.
This does not mean that a domain administrator has to know the
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
details of all the sub-domains and hosts to the Nth degree, but simply that if a problem occurs he can get it fixed by calling on the administrator of the sub-domain containing the problem.
Top Level Domain Requirements
There are very few top level domains, each of these may have many second level domains.
An initial set of top level names has been identified. Each of these has an administrator and an agent.
The top level domains:
ARPA = The ARPA-Internet *** TEMPORARY ***
Administrator: DARPA Agent: The Network Information Center Mailbox: HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA>
GOV = Government
Administrator: DARPA Agent: The Network Information Center Mailbox: HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA>
EDU = Education
Administrator: DARPA Agent: The Network Information Center Mailbox: HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA>
COM = Commercial
Administrator: DARPA Agent: The Network Information Center Mailbox: HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA>
MIL = Military
Administrator: DDN-PMO Agent: The Network Information Center Mailbox: HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA>
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
ORG = Organization
Administrator: DARPA Agent: The Network Information Center Mailbox: HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA>
Countries
The English two letter code (alpha-2) identifying a country according the the ISO Standard for "Codes for the Representation of Names of Countries" [5].
As yet no country domains have been established. As they are established information about the administrators and agents will be made public, and will be listed in subsequent editions of this memo.
Multiorganizations
A multiorganization may be a top level domain if it is large, and is composed of other organizations; particularly if the multiorganization can not be easily classified into one of the categories and is international in scope.
As yet no multiorganization domains have been established. As they are established information about the administrators and agents will be made public, and will be listed in subsequent editions of this memo.
Note: The NIC is listed as the agent and registrar for all the currently allowed top level domains. If there are other entities that would be more appropriate agents and registrars for some or all of these domains then it would be desirable to reassign the responsibility.
Second Level Domain Requirements
Each top level domain may have many second level domains. Every second level domain must meet the general requirements on a domain specified above, and be registered with a top level domain administrator.
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
Third through Nth Level Domain Requirements
Each second level domain may have many third level domains, etc. Every third level domain (through Nth level domain) must meet the requirements set by the administrator of the immediately higher level domain. Note that these may be more or less strict than the general requirements. One would expect the minimum size requirements to decrease at each level.
The ARPA Domain
At the time the implementation of the domain concept was begun it was thought that the set of hosts under the administrative authority of DARPA would make up a domain. Thus the initial domain selected was called ARPA. Now it is seen that there is no strong motivation for there to be a top level ARPA domain. The plan is for the current ARPA domain to go out of business as soon as possible. Hosts that are currently members of the ARPA domain should make arrangements to join another domain. It is likely that for experimental purposes there will be a second level domain called ARPA in the ORG domain (i.e., there will probably be an ARPA.ORG domain).
The DDN Hosts
DDN hosts that do not desire to participate in this domain naming system will continue to use the HOSTS.TXT data file maintained by the NIC for name to address translations. This file will be kept up to date for the DDN hosts. However, all DDN hosts will change their names from "host.ARPA" to (for example) "host.DDN.MIL" some time in the future. The schedule for changes required in DDN hosts will be established by the DDN-PMO.
Impact on Hosts
What is a host administrator to do about all this?
For existing hosts already operating in the ARPA-Internet, the best advice is to sit tight for now. Take a few months to consider the options, then select a domain to join. Plan carefully for the impact that changing your host name will have on both your local users and on their remote correspondents.
For a new host, careful thought should be given (as discussed below). Some guidance can be obtained by comparing notes on what other hosts with similar administrative properties have done.
The owner of a host may decide which domain to join, and the
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
administrator of a domain may decide which hosts to accept into his domain. Thus the owner of a host and a domain administrator must come to an understanding about the host being in the domain. This is the foundation of responsible administration.
For example, a host "XYZ" at MIT might possible be considered as a candidate for becoming any of XYZ.ARPA.ORG, XYZ.CSNET, or XYZ.MIT.EDU.
The owner of host XYZ may choose which domain to join, depending on which domain administrators are willing to have him.
The domain is part of the host name. Thus if USC-ISIA.ARPA changes its domain affiliation to DDN.MIL to become USC-ISIA.DDN.MIL, it has changed its name. This means that any previous references to USC-ISIA.ARPA are now out of date. Such old references may include private host name to address tables, and any recorded information about mailboxes such as mailing lists, the headers of old messages, printed directories, and peoples' memories.
The experience of the DARPA community suggests that changing the name of a host is somewhat painful. It is recommended that careful thought be given to choosing a new name for a host - which includes selecting its place in the domain hierarchy.
The Roles of the Network Information Center
The NIC plays two types of roles in the administration of domains. First, the NIC is the registrar of all top level domains. Second the NIC is the administrator of several top level domains (and the registrar for second level domains in these).
Top Level Domain Registrar
As the registrar for top level domains, the NIC is the contact point for investigating the possibility of establishing a new top level domain.
Top Level Domain Administrator
For the top level domains designated so far, the NIC is the administrator of each of these domains. This means the NIC is responsible for the management of these domains and the registration of the second level domains or hosts (if at the second level) in these domains.
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
It may be reasonable for the administration of some of these domains to be taken on by other authorities in the future. It is certainly not desired that the NIC be the administrator of all top level domains forever.
Prototypical Questions
To establish a domain, the following information must be provided to the NIC Domain Registrar (HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA>):
Note: The key people must have computer mail mailboxes and NIC-Idents. If they do not at present, please remedy the situation at once. A NIC-Ident may be established by contacting NIC@SRI-NIC.ARPA <mailto:NIC@SRI-NIC.ARPA>.
1) The name of the top level domain to join.
For example: EDU
2) The name, title, mailing address, phone number, and organization of the administrative head of the organization. This is the contact point for administrative and policy questions about the domain. In the case of a research project, this should be the Principal Investigator. The online mailbox and NIC-Ident of this person should also be included.
For example:
Administrator
Organization USC/Information Sciences Institute Name Keith Uncapher Title Executive Director Mail Address USC/ISI 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001 Marina del Rey, CA. 90292-6695 Phone Number 213-822-1511 Net Mailbox Uncapher@USC-ISIB.ARPA <mailto:Uncapher@USC-ISIB.ARPA> NIC-Ident KU
3) The name, title, mailing address, phone number, and organization of the domain technical contact. The online mailbox and NIC-Ident of the domain technical contact should also be included. This is the contact point for problems with the domain and for updating information about the domain. Also, the domain technical contact may be responsible for hosts in this domain.
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
For example:
Technical Contact
Organization USC/Information Sciences Institute Name Craig Milo Rogers Title Researcher Mail Address USC/ISI 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001 Marina del Rey, CA. 90292-6695 Phone Number 213-822-1511 Net Mailbox Rogers@USC-ISIB.ARPA <mailto:Rogers@USC-ISIB.ARPA> NIC-Ident CMR
4) The name, title, mailing address, phone number, and organization of the zone technical contact. The online mailbox and NIC-Ident of the zone technical contact should also be included. This is the contact point for problems with the zone and for updating information about the zone. In many cases the zone technical contact and the domain technical contact will be the same person.
For example:
Technical Contact
Organization USC/Information Sciences Institute Name Craig Milo Rogers Title Researcher Mail Address USC/ISI 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001 Marina del Rey, CA. 90292-6695 Phone Number 213-822-1511 Net Mailbox Rogers@USC-ISIB.ARPA <mailto:Rogers@USC-ISIB.ARPA> NIC-Ident CMR
5) The name of the domain (up to 12 characters). This is the name that will be used in tables and lists associating the domain and the domain server addresses. [While technically domain names can be quite long (programmers beware), shorter names are easier for people to cope with.]
For example: ALPHA-BETA
6) A description of the servers that provides the domain service for translating name to address for hosts in this domain, and the date they will be operational.
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
A good way to answer this question is to say "Our server is supplied by person or company X and does whatever their standard issue server does".
For example: Our server is a copy of the server operated by the NIC, and will be installed and made operational on 1-November-84.
7) A description of the server machines, including:
(a) hardware and software (using keywords from the Assigned Numbers)
(b) addresses (what host on what net for each connected net)
For example:
(a) hardware and software
VAX-11/750 and UNIX, or IBM-PC and MS-DOS, or DEC-1090 and TOPS-20
(b) address
10.9.0.193 on ARPANET
8) An estimate of the number of hosts that will be in the domain.
(a) initially, (b) within one year, (c) two years, and (d) five years.
For example:
(a) initially = 50 (b) one year = 100 (c) two years = 200 (d) five years = 500
RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc920.html> October 1984 Domain Requirements
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the many people who contributed to this memo, including the participants in the Namedroppers Group, the ICCB, the PCCB, and especially the staff of the Network Information Center, particularly J. Feinler and K. Harrenstien.
References
[1] Postel, J., "The Domain Names Plan and Schedule", RFC-881 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc881.html>, USC Information Sciences Institute, November 1983.
[2] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities", RFC-882 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc882.html>, USC Information Sciences Institute, November 1983.
[3] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and Specification", RFC-883 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc883.html>, USC Information Sciences Institute, November 1983.
[4] Postel, J., "Domain Name System Implementation Schedule", RFC-897 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc897.html>, USC Information Sciences Institute, February 1984.
[5] ISO, "Codes for the Representation of Names of Countries", ISO-3166, International Standards Organization, May 1981.
[6] Postel, J., "Domain Name System Implementation Schedule - Revised", RFC-921 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc921.html>, USC Information Sciences Institute, October 1984.
[7] Mockapetris, P., "The Domain Name System", Proceedings of the IFIP 6.5 Working Conference on Computer Message Services, Nottingham, England, May 1984. Also as ISI/RS-84-133, June 1984.
[8] Mockapetris, P., J. Postel, and P. Kirton, "Name Server Design for Distributed Systems", Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computer Communication, October 30 to November 3 1984, Sidney, Australia. Also as ISI/RS-84-132, June 1984.
Comment on RFC 920 <http://www.faqs.org/rfccomment.php?rfcnum=920>
Previous: RFC 0919 - Broadcasting Internet Datagrams <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc919.html>
Next: RFC 0921 - Domain name system implementation schedule - revised <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc921.html>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ RFC Index <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/> | RFC Search <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfcsearch.html> | Usenet FAQs <http://www.faqs.org/faqs/> | Web FAQs <http://www.faqs.org/contrib/> | Documents <http://www.faqs.org/docs/> | Cities <http://www.city-data.com/> ]
*Kiyoshi I. Tsuru Bello, Guzmán, Morales y Tsuru, S.C. *Agustín Manuel Chávez 1 - 104 Centro de Ciudad Santa Fe 01210, México, D.F. Tel. +52 (55) 5292-5232 Fax +52 (55) 5292-5233 www.bgmt.com.mx <http://www.bgmt.com.mx/>
La información contenida en este mensaje de datos es confidencial, constituye un secreto industrial en términos de la legislación vigente y se encuentra dirigida exclusivamente al destinatario indicado en dicho mensaje. Si usted recibe esta información por error o si usted no es el destinatario del mensaje, favor de destruirlo inmediatamente, absteniéndose de leerlo, reproducirlo, transmitirlo, almacenarlo, divulgarlo, revelarlo o usarlo de manera directa o indirecta en cualquier forma y por cualquier medio. Muchas gracias. The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, privileged and intended for its recipient only. If you receive this mail by mistake and/or if you are not the recipient thereof, please destroy it immediately, abstaining yourself from reading, reproducing, transmitting, storing, disclosing, revealing or using it, either directly or indirectly, in any manner and by any means. Thank you very much.
-- -rwr Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross Skydasher: A great way to start your day My weblog: http://www.byte.org
participants (1)
-
Ross Rader