Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
Hi, It was mentioned that in keeping with our current practice of being explicit with timings as much as possible, we should be more specific about when we will take the required PDP votes after receiving an Issues report. This motion is intended to fill that gap. thanks a. ---- Moved by: Avri Doria Seconded: Whereas: An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has been produced and introduced to the GNSO Council. Resolve: The GNSO Council members will consult with their constituencies in preparation for a vote on a PDP and other possible motions at the Council meeting on 8 January 2009.
Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would suggest what I hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 January 2009 to 29 January 2009. That would give Staff until 15 January to provide the clarification that my motion seeks. I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded and passes. Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
Hi,
It was mentioned that in keeping with our current practice of being explicit with timings as much as possible, we should be more specific about when we will take the required PDP votes after receiving an Issues report. This motion is intended to fill that gap.
thanks
a.
----
Moved by: Avri Doria Seconded:
Whereas:
An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has been produced and introduced to the GNSO Council.
Resolve:
The GNSO Council members will consult with their constituencies in preparation for a vote on a PDP and other possible motions at the Council meeting on 8 January 2009.
Hi Chuck, If the council is ready to vote on your motion, then i think it would be appropriate to amend it to include the date for voting on the PDP, i.e. the pro-forma motion one I am offering can be folded into yours as a friendly amendment if you accept it. On the other hand if the council is not ready to vote on yours or if it fails in a vote, then my pro-forma motion can stand as it is. I.e. my motion can be contingent on yours. Would that be ok? a. On 12 Dec 2008, at 17:41, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would suggest what I hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 January 2009 to 29 January 2009. That would give Staff until 15 January to provide the clarification that my motion seeks.
I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded and passes.
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
Hi,
It was mentioned that in keeping with our current practice of being explicit with timings as much as possible, we should be more specific about when we will take the required PDP votes after receiving an Issues report. This motion is intended to fill that gap.
thanks
a.
----
Moved by: Avri Doria Seconded:
Whereas:
An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has been produced and introduced to the GNSO Council.
Resolve:
The GNSO Council members will consult with their constituencies in preparation for a vote on a PDP and other possible motions at the Council meeting on 8 January 2009.
I amended my Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery alternative motion as suggested by Avri and as highlighted in the attached file and I posted it on the wiki. Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:57 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
Hi Chuck,
If the council is ready to vote on your motion, then i think it would be appropriate to amend it to include the date for voting on the PDP, i.e. the pro-forma motion one I am offering can be folded into yours as a friendly amendment if you accept it.
On the other hand if the council is not ready to vote on yours or if it fails in a vote, then my pro-forma motion can stand as it is. I.e. my motion can be contingent on yours.
Would that be ok?
a.
On 12 Dec 2008, at 17:41, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would suggest what I hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 January 2009 to 29 January 2009. That would give Staff until 15 January to provide the clarification that my motion seeks.
I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded and passes.
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
Hi,
It was mentioned that in keeping with our current practice of being explicit with timings as much as possible, we should be more specific about when we will take the required PDP votes after receiving an Issues report. This motion is intended to fill that gap.
thanks
a.
----
Moved by: Avri Doria Seconded:
Whereas:
An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has been produced and introduced to the GNSO Council.
Resolve:
The GNSO Council members will consult with their constituencies in preparation for a vote on a PDP and other possible motions at the Council meeting on 8 January 2009.
participants (2)
-
Avri Doria -
Gomes, Chuck