GNSO Review of the GAC Communique
Hello All, Please see the attached review of the GAC Communique and the motion for consideration at the April Council meeting. Best regards, Susan Kawaguchi Domain Name Manager Facebook Legal Dept.
Hi Susan, thank you for the hard work on this. One question regarding the P/P Service Accreditation Issues Advice however: Should we not in our response be a bit more clear that the comments of the GAC have been taken under consideration and addressed by the working group? Merely voicing disappointment may be too weak a signal of pushing back on what is essentially the GAC trying to overrule a PDP process after not getting the result they wanted in the PDP. Am 05.04.2016 um 00:43 schrieb Susan Kawaguchi:
Hello All,
Please see the attached review of the GAC Communique and the motion for consideration at the April Council meeting.
Best regards,
Susan Kawaguchi Domain Name Manager Facebook Legal Dept.
-- Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Volker A. Greimann - Rechtsabteilung - Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook: www.facebook.com/KeySystems www.twitter.com/key_systems Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen. -------------------------------------------- Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Best regards, Volker A. Greimann - legal department - Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated: www.facebook.com/KeySystems www.twitter.com/key_systems CEO: Alexander Siffrin Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
Thank you Susan. I second the motion. Jennifer From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 6:43 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] GNSO Review of the GAC Communique Hello All, Please see the attached review of the GAC Communique and the motion for consideration at the April Council meeting. Best regards, Susan Kawaguchi Domain Name Manager Facebook Legal Dept.
Susan and Rubens I've made some changes and added a comment. While, I did use track changes I'm not confident my suggested changes are easily recognisable, so I'll summarise them here for ease of reference. Future gTLD Rounds: As the GAC has outlined there are many ongoing reviews that address the new gTLD program. The original word was PDPs and I changed this to reviews because I felt this better reflected the work efforts currently underway and is more consistent with the references in the GAC communique. I also asked a question for the Council in response to the text: The community along with the board should make it a priority to ensure that there is a logical sequence in the review and resulting policy review. Is this something the GNSO should take the lead on? The RySG and RrSG have raised this issue with the Board on a number of occasions. Bruce Tonkin is of the view that there are two efforts that need to be complete before the launch of any new gTLDs: the CCT RT and the Subsequent Round PDP. I also marked up the text on underserved regions to make it more specific, but I don't believe I changed the intent: The GNSO council agrees that raising awareness of any future efforts to introduce new gTLDs in the underserved regions should be an important consideration. However, we would also like to note that having gTLD registry operators is only one part of the problem since registrants also need registrars or resellers with local language and payment method support. PPSAI I added a sentence to the response on this issue which some folks may think is too blunt, so I'm okay to delete if others are uncomfortable with it: The Council notes that the GAC provided comments on the PPSAI Final Report via the Public Safety Working Group, which were considered by the Working Group. It is the hope of the Council that the GAC will not use the opportunity to discuss the Final Report of the WG as an opportunity to discuss new concerns. Thanks Donna Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc. Policy and Industry Affairs Manager Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email: donna.austin@neustar.biz<mailto:donna.austin@neustar.biz> ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message. Follow Neustar: [cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc> [cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> [cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Monday, 4 April 2016 3:43 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] GNSO Review of the GAC Communique Hello All, Please see the attached review of the GAC Communique and the motion for consideration at the April Council meeting. Best regards, Susan Kawaguchi Domain Name Manager Facebook Legal Dept.
It is not too blunt as far as I am concerned. I agree with Volker that we need to send a message on that one. You have already given a significant concession by not pointing out that the comments of the public safety group were not sent in on time or in the usual way. cheers Stephanie Perrin On 2016-04-06 14:34, Austin, Donna wrote:
Susan and Rubens
I’ve made some changes and added a comment. While, I did use track changes I’m not confident my suggested changes are easily recognisable, so I’ll summarise them here for ease of reference.
Future gTLD Rounds:
Asthe GAC has outlined there are many ongoing reviews that address the new gTLD program.
The original word was PDPs and I changed this to reviews because I felt this better reflected the work efforts currently underway and is more consistent with the references in the GAC communique.
I also asked a question for the Council in response to the text: The community along with the board should make it a priority to ensure that there is a logical sequence in the review and resulting policy review.
Is this something the GNSO should take the lead on? The RySG and RrSG have raised this issue with the Board on a number of occasions. Bruce Tonkin is of the view that there are two efforts that need to be complete before the launch of any new gTLDs: the CCT RT and the Subsequent Round PDP.
I also marked up the text on underserved regions to make it more specific, but I don’t believe I changed the intent:
The GNSO council agrees that raising awareness of any future efforts to introduce new gTLDs in the underserved regions should be an important consideration. However, we would also like to note that having gTLD registry operators is only one part of the problem since registrants also need registrars or resellers with local language and payment method support.
PPSAI
I added a sentence to the response on this issue which some folks may think is too blunt, so I’m okay to delete if others are uncomfortable with it:
The Council notes that the GAC provided comments on the PPSAI Final Report via the Public Safety Working Group, which were considered by the Working Group. It is the hope of the Council that the GAC will not use the opportunity to discuss the Final Report of the WG as an opportunity to discuss new concerns.
Thanks
Donna
*Donna Austin**:****Neustar, Inc.** *Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
*Cell:***+1.310.890.9655 *Email: *donna.austin@neustar.biz <mailto:donna.austin@neustar.biz>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message.
*Follow Neustar:*cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
*From:*owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Kawaguchi *Sent:* Monday, 4 April 2016 3:43 PM *To:* council@gnso.icann.org *Subject:* [council] GNSO Review of the GAC Communique
Hello All,
Please see the attached review of the GAC Communique and the motion for consideration at the April Council meeting.
Best regards,
Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.
Thanks to Donna for reminding me of the reply all problem, I had already forgotten. Too many lists....here we go again cheers Stephanie -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] RE: GNSO Review of the GAC Communique Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:24:19 -0400 From: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin@neustar.biz>, Susan Kawaguchi <susank@fb.com>, council@gnso.icann.org <council@gnso.icann.org> It is not too blunt as far as I am concerned. I agree with Volker that we need to send a message on that one. You have already given a significant concession by not pointing out that the comments of the public safety group were not sent in on time or in the usual way. cheers Stephanie Perrin On 2016-04-06 14:34, Austin, Donna wrote:
Susan and Rubens
I’ve made some changes and added a comment. While, I did use track changes I’m not confident my suggested changes are easily recognisable, so I’ll summarise them here for ease of reference.
Future gTLD Rounds:
Asthe GAC has outlined there are many ongoing reviews that address the new gTLD program.
The original word was PDPs and I changed this to reviews because I felt this better reflected the work efforts currently underway and is more consistent with the references in the GAC communique.
I also asked a question for the Council in response to the text: The community along with the board should make it a priority to ensure that there is a logical sequence in the review and resulting policy review.
Is this something the GNSO should take the lead on? The RySG and RrSG have raised this issue with the Board on a number of occasions. Bruce Tonkin is of the view that there are two efforts that need to be complete before the launch of any new gTLDs: the CCT RT and the Subsequent Round PDP.
I also marked up the text on underserved regions to make it more specific, but I don’t believe I changed the intent:
The GNSO council agrees that raising awareness of any future efforts to introduce new gTLDs in the underserved regions should be an important consideration. However, we would also like to note that having gTLD registry operators is only one part of the problem since registrants also need registrars or resellers with local language and payment method support.
PPSAI
I added a sentence to the response on this issue which some folks may think is too blunt, so I’m okay to delete if others are uncomfortable with it:
The Council notes that the GAC provided comments on the PPSAI Final Report via the Public Safety Working Group, which were considered by the Working Group. It is the hope of the Council that the GAC will not use the opportunity to discuss the Final Report of the WG as an opportunity to discuss new concerns.
Thanks
Donna
*Donna Austin**:****Neustar, Inc.** *Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
*Cell:***+1.310.890.9655 *Email: *donna.austin@neustar.biz <mailto:donna.austin@neustar.biz>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message.
*Follow Neustar:*cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
*From:*owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Kawaguchi *Sent:* Monday, 4 April 2016 3:43 PM *To:* council@gnso.icann.org *Subject:* [council] GNSO Review of the GAC Communique
Hello All,
Please see the attached review of the GAC Communique and the motion for consideration at the April Council meeting.
Best regards,
Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.
participants (5)
-
Austin, Donna -
Jennifer Gore Standiford -
Stephanie Perrin -
Susan Kawaguchi -
Volker Greimann