RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)
OK with me. Jonathan. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of john@crediblecontext.com Sent: 10 May 2011 19:57 To: Stéphane_Van_Gelder Cc: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO; Adrian Kinderis Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG) You have my vote. Berard -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG) From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com <http://stephane.vangelder@indom.com%3e> >; Date: Tue, May 10, 2011 11:24 am To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> Cc: "council@gnso.icann.org GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> I would be happy to send such a message. Is there support from the Council for me to do so? Stéphane Le 10 mai 2011 à 18:57, Adrian Kinderis a écrit : I find the text a little misleading. I do not think it states strongly enough that the GNSO has not reviewed nor does it have a current position on the Board. Stephane – can you email the Board directly and let them know, separately, the GNSO’s understanding and status with this report? Thanks. Adrian Kinderis From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 2:13 AM To: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Subject: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG) Councillors, Please find below the message sent by ALAC to the Board. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : De : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> Date : 10 mai 2011 10:57:20 HAEC À : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> Cc : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> Objet : Réexp : Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG) Dear Stéphane, please be so kind to receive a copy of the finalised JAS Second Milestone Report, as transmitted by the ALAC to the Board. As mentioned in the staff intro, another message from the ALAC will be sent to the Board after the expiry of the ALAC comment period at the end of the week. This will include an erratum to fix small errors/inconsistencies pointed out by our membership. I shall also forward of copy of that follow-up message to you. Kind regards, Olivier -------- Message original -------- Sujet: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG) Date : Mon, 9 May 2011 18:27:43 -0700 De : ICANN At-Large Staff <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Pour : Secretary <mailto:secretary@icann.org> <secretary@icann.org> Copie à : ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> <ocl@gih.com>, carlton.samuels@gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>, rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, ICANN At-Large Staff <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Dear all, The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group ( JAS WG) (attached). We request that this Report be forwarded to the members of the ICANN Board. The main objective of the JAS WG is to develop a sustainable approach in providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs Registries. This Report was received by the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 6 May 2011 and is currently undergoing evaluation. Comments from the At-Large Community are now being gathered until 13 May 2011 and will be transmitted to the Board in a separate document. The ALAC ratification process will follow, the results of which will also be sent to the Board. Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted independently and has not reached the approval stage. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber-White, and Marilyn Vernon ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org website: www.atlarge.icann.org __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6110 (20110510) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
participants (2)
-
john@crediblecontext.com -
Jonathan Robinson