Chuck, So I assume then that my "unfriendly" amendment will be voted on prior to the motion, correct? Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@gmail.com> Date: Tue, March 30, 2010 8:20 pm To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>, Tim Ruiz <tim@godaddy.com>, GNSO Council <council@gnso.icann.org> Hi, I do not see it as a friendly amendment. Regards Olga 2010/3/30 Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> Olga? Do you see this as a friendly amendment? Adrian Kinderis From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 3:33 AM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: Tim Ruiz; GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT Hello, unfortunately, I cannot see it as friendly amendment. Regards Rafik 2010/3/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com> Rafik/Olga, Do you accept this as a friendly amendment? Chuck

-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org

[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:20 PM To: GNSO Council Subject: RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT

Since it seems to be agreed that what is intended is to look for funding opportunities outside of ICANN's own budget to possibly resolve this concern, I would like to make that evident in the motion and propose this friendly amendment:

Add the following to the first Resolve:

keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to recover the costs of new gTLD applications and on-going services to new gTLDs

So the first Resolve would read:

Resolved, that the GNSO Council supports the formation of a joint SO/AC working group to respond to the Board's request by developing a sustainable approach to providing support to new gTLD applicants requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDS, keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to recover the costs of new gTLD applications and on-going services to new gTLDs;

Tim

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Date: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:43 am To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org>

Hello,

I want to submit motion to approve joint SO/AC council working group on new gTLD applicant support the motion document is attached.

Regards

Rafik