RE: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
Brian, and update on this? Alan At 16/10/2012 10:16 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:
Dear Alan thank you for your quick feedback. I will circulate a new draft shortly and be sure to include the additional information as promised earlier as appendices. I look forward to any additional feedback from the Council.
Best,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt Partner <mailto:bwinterfeldt@steptoe.com>bwinterfeldt@steptoe.com Steptoe
From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:18 AM To: Winterfeldt, Brian; 'council@gnso.icann.org' Subject: Re: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
Brian, several comments:
- does this imply that you will not be sending any of the detailed breakdowns by SG/Const, including the explanatory notes that
- the use of the term SG is confusing, as it normally stands for Stakeholder Group in the GNSO context.
- Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation, giving percentages of the SG without any information about its constitution is not very informative.
- the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies is unclear, as the GNSO has (I think!) five constituencies in two Stakeholder Groups, and two Stakeholder Groups without constituencies.
Alan
At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:
Dear Councilors,
As was discussed in Saturdays session with regard to the WHOIS RT work, attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board detailing our various constituencies recommendations as to whether a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS enhancements.
We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to hearing your views so that we may move forward as soon as possible with providing our communication to the Board. Thank you.
Best regards,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt
I have only received feedback from two councilors. I was waiting to circulate a revised draft hoping to receive additional feedback. In addition, at least one constituency said they were meeting this week and might be changing their positions with regard to some of the votes. I have not heard back from them either. I have a revised draft ready to send as soon as we are satisfied that we have received all feedback necessary. I am hoping to get that today so I can send a new draft around tomorrow. Best, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Partner bwinterfeldt@steptoe.com<mailto:bwinterfeldt@steptoe.com> Steptoe From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:45 PM To: Winterfeldt, Brian Cc: 'council@gnso.icann.org' Subject: RE: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations Brian, and update on this? Alan At 16/10/2012 10:16 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote: Dear Alan - thank you for your quick feedback. I will circulate a new draft shortly and be sure to include the additional information as promised earlier as appendices. I look forward to any additional feedback from the Council. Best, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Partner bwinterfeldt@steptoe.com<mailto:bwinterfeldt@steptoe.com> Steptoe From: Alan Greenberg [ mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:18 AM To: Winterfeldt, Brian; 'council@gnso.icann.org' Subject: Re: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations Brian, several comments: - does this imply that you will not be sending any of the detailed breakdowns by SG/Const, including the explanatory notes that - the use of the term SG is confusing, as it normally stands for Stakeholder Group in the GNSO context. - Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation, giving percentages of the SG without any information about its constitution is not very informative. - the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies is unclear, as the GNSO has (I think!) five constituencies in two Stakeholder Groups, and two Stakeholder Groups without constituencies. Alan At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote: Dear Councilors, As was discussed in Saturday's session with regard to the WHOIS RT work, attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board detailing our various constituencies' recommendations as to whether a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS enhancements. We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to hearing your views so that we may move forward as soon as possible with providing our communication to the Board. Thank you. Best regards, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt
participants (2)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Winterfeldt, Brian