Apologies - I didn’t copy the entire list. Sorry! Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be<mailto:marie.pattullo@aim.be>> Date: 21 August 2019 at 19:31:25 GMT+2 To: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>> Subject: RE: Draft Council Response Acknowledging Receipt of ICANN's Whois Accuracy/ARS Letter Keith, all, Again, many thanks for the work here. For my own understanding, do we know if ICANN anticipates developing an update to the ARS for cases where ICANN itself is asserting its own purposes for processing data which is non-public and disclosed upon request? Of course we know that a lawful solution for ARS has to be found, so it would be interesting to know if there has been any preparatory work on this. As the Phase 1 Report implied in Rec 4 that ARS won’t be changed, although footnote 6 said that it will be “considered”, the BC would certainly support Council confirming that the ARS is included as part of the EPDP’s Phase 2 work. Thanks, Marie From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Drazek, Keith via council Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 7:16 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [council] Draft Council Response Acknowledging Receipt of ICANN's Whois Accuracy/ARS Letter Hi all, In preparation for our 22 August Council meeting, and further discussion of the topic, attached is a draft letter acknowledging receipt of Goran’s 21 June letter on WHOIS Accuracy and ARS. This is not a substantive response, so it should be fairly straightforward. Here’s the link to the original letter from Goran: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-drazek-21jun19... Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks, Keith