Re: [council] FOR REVIEW: Draft Recommendations Report on Curative Rights
Thanks, all. I am consulting with the BC membership, but some initial thoughts: · 4 - Agree that it makes sense to go to the same IRT as for the Red Cross. · 5 - Although not for these Recs, notable that we will need legal expertise for Rec 5 in the new RPM group. Maybe worth a reference that we will need to budget for that? · 7 - Think we should also mention the latest GAC letter<https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/ismail-to-drazek-17apr19-en.pdf> (17th April). · 10 – Perhaps we should be explicit that the implementation may need to be revisited depending on the outcome of the work on Rec 5? Best Marie From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 7:28 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] FOR REVIEW: Draft Recommendations Report on Curative Rights Dear Councilors, Please find attached for your review a draft Recommendations Report covering the four PDP recommendations on IGO-INGO Curative Rights that the Council approved at its meeting last month. As a reminder, under the ICANN Bylaws (Annex A, Section 8), the Council is required to submit a Recommendations Report to the Board (following Council approval of PDP recommendations and prior to any Board action). Please let us know if you have any questions or comments on the document. As is customary, and subject to any contrary request by a Councilor, the staff expectation is that the report will be placed on the Council’s consent agenda for the 16 May meeting. Thanks and cheers Steve & Mary
Sorry to come back to this, but may I please check – are paras 7 and 10 (& 5?) going ahead as originally drafted or are the below changes possible? Thanks again, Marie From: Marie Pattullo Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 4:05 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: Draft Recommendations Report on Curative Rights Thanks, all. I am consulting with the BC membership, but some initial thoughts: · 4 - Agree that it makes sense to go to the same IRT as for the Red Cross. · 5 - Although not for these Recs, notable that we will need legal expertise for Rec 5 in the new RPM group. Maybe worth a reference that we will need to budget for that? · 7 - Think we should also mention the latest GAC letter<https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/ismail-to-drazek-17apr19-en.pdf> (17th April). · 10 – Perhaps we should be explicit that the implementation may need to be revisited depending on the outcome of the work on Rec 5? Best Marie From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 7:28 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] FOR REVIEW: Draft Recommendations Report on Curative Rights Dear Councilors, Please find attached for your review a draft Recommendations Report covering the four PDP recommendations on IGO-INGO Curative Rights that the Council approved at its meeting last month. As a reminder, under the ICANN Bylaws (Annex A, Section 8), the Council is required to submit a Recommendations Report to the Board (following Council approval of PDP recommendations and prior to any Board action). Please let us know if you have any questions or comments on the document. As is customary, and subject to any contrary request by a Councilor, the staff expectation is that the report will be placed on the Council’s consent agenda for the 16 May meeting. Thanks and cheers Steve & Mary
participants (1)
-
Marie Pattullo