Michele +1 Erika On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight < michele@blacknight.com> wrote:

Rafik

Thanks for your work on this.

The “elephant” this time round is probably whois, but since the current status of GDPR / Whois / RDS work is in flux I personally don’t think we can really add anything more to that. The board are fully aware of this as well.

Regards

Michele

--

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

https://www.blacknight.com/

http://blacknight.blog/

Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Personal blog: https://michele.blog/

Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty

Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845

*From: *council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> *Date: *Tuesday 10 April 2018 at 00:51 *To: *Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject: *[council] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique

Hi all,

we have to send our response asap, the GAC-Board call is scheduled for Wednesday and so we got a short time window to finalize it.

please raise any concerns you want to flag asap attaching the doc again for your review.

Best,

Rafik

2018-04-09 19:55 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>:

Hi all,

please find attached for your review and feedback the draft version of GNSO Review of GAC Communique. from the small team of volunteers.

Best,

Rafik

_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

Rafik That’s correct as it reflects the current status Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday 10 April 2018 at 12:20 To: Michele Neylon <michele@blacknight.com> Cc: Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique Hi Michele, thanks for the comment, just to be clear, you are ok with the current comment:"Yes. The RDS PDP working group is currently active, however in light of GDPR the PDP WG is currently reviewing its options both with the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board." and not requesting any change? Best, Rafik 2018-04-10 17:50 GMT+09:00 Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com<mailto:michele@blacknight.com>>: Rafik Thanks for your work on this. The “elephant” this time round is probably whois, but since the current status of GDPR / Whois / RDS work is in flux I personally don’t think we can really add anything more to that. The board are fully aware of this as well. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday 10 April 2018 at 00:51 To: Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique Hi all, we have to send our response asap, the GAC-Board call is scheduled for Wednesday and so we got a short time window to finalize it. please raise any concerns you want to flag asap attaching the doc again for your review. Best, Rafik 2018-04-09 19:55 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>>: Hi all, please find attached for your review and feedback the draft version of GNSO Review of GAC Communique. from the small team of volunteers. Best, Rafik

Huge thanks to Rafik for leading the group to a result in a short timeframe! I support the version circulated most recently by Rafik with Donna's changes. In my view we've slightly diverged from the point re IGOs and might have done better with a more concise response, but in light of the time (my fault for not weighing in constructively sooner - sorry, Rafik) I personally think we go with what we have. Best wishes, Heather On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks, Donna for those changes, I am attached the new version of the GNSO response which includes them.

Best,

Rafik

2018-04-11 10:18 GMT+09:00 Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin@team.neustar>:

...

Rafik, all

I’m really sorry for these late additions, but I think we could be clearer in our message on Other Issues and as such suggest the following replace what we currently have:

Identifying whether an issue has public policy implications is not the role of the PDP WG. This is generally because its members are not assumed to have this particular expertise. The introduction of the quick look mechanism, a recommendation of the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group, is an important mechanism that provides the GAC an opportunity to identify public policy issues early in the PDP lifecycle. We acknowledge that the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group also encouraged PDP Working Groups to communicate to the GAC about how its input has been considered and addressed; and also encourages the GAC to strengthen its participation in the latter stages of the PDP.

The Council acknowledges the challenges associated with GAC members being able to participate in PDP efforts and in that regard, we greatly appreciate the manner in which GAC members are participating in WT5 of the Subsequent Procedures PDP WG, particularly with regard to identifying public policy issues.

Thanks

Donna

*From:* council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak *Sent:* Monday, April 09, 2018 4:50 PM *To:* Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [council] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique

Hi all,

we have to send our response asap, the GAC-Board call is scheduled for Wednesday and so we got a short time window to finalize it.

please raise any concerns you want to flag asap attaching the doc again for your review.

Best,

Rafik

2018-04-09 19:55 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>:

Hi all,

please find attached for your review and feedback the draft version of GNSO Review of GAC Communique. from the small team of volunteers.

Best,

Rafik

_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

Thanks all for your support and getting this done in short time, Best, Rafik 2018-04-11 18:49 GMT+09:00 <philippe.fouquart@orange.com>:

Rafik, Donna and all, thanks for this, it’s fine with me.

I guess it’s “encourage the GAC to strengthen…” at the end of the first paragraph (no s, [we] encourage).

Regards,

Philippe Fouquart

*From:* council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:39 AM *To:* Austin, Donna *Cc:* Council GNSO *Subject:* Re: [council] [EXTERNAL] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique

Thanks, Donna for those changes, I am attached the new version of the GNSO response which includes them.

Best,

Rafik

2018-04-11 10:18 GMT+09:00 Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin@team.neustar>:

Rafik, all

I’m really sorry for these late additions, but I think we could be clearer in our message on Other Issues and as such suggest the following replace what we currently have:

Identifying whether an issue has public policy implications is not the role of the PDP WG. This is generally because its members are not assumed to have this particular expertise. The introduction of the quick look mechanism, a recommendation of the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group, is an important mechanism that provides the GAC an opportunity to identify public policy issues early in the PDP lifecycle. We acknowledge that the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group also encouraged PDP Working Groups to communicate to the GAC about how its input has been considered and addressed; and also encourages the GAC to strengthen its participation in the latter stages of the PDP.

The Council acknowledges the challenges associated with GAC members being able to participate in PDP efforts and in that regard, we greatly appreciate the manner in which GAC members are participating in WT5 of the Subsequent Procedures PDP WG, particularly with regard to identifying public policy issues.

Thanks

Donna

*From:* council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak *Sent:* Monday, April 09, 2018 4:50 PM *To:* Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [council] [Urgent] Draft GNSO Review of GAC Communique

Hi all,

we have to send our response asap, the GAC-Board call is scheduled for Wednesday and so we got a short time window to finalize it.

please raise any concerns you want to flag asap attaching the doc again for your review.

Best,

Rafik

2018-04-09 19:55 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>:

Hi all,

please find attached for your review and feedback the draft version of GNSO Review of GAC Communique. from the small team of volunteers.

Best,

Rafik

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.