GNSO Council follow up on ICANN staff recommendation to the ICANN Board in response to the WIPO-II recommendations
Hello Paul, At the last Council teleconference, a question was raised regarding the follow-up to the last Board resolution on WIPO from the KL meeting. The GNSO Council wishes to know what recommendation the ICANN staff will be making to the Board for the meeting in Cape Town. From: http://www.icann.org/minutes/kl-resolutions-23jul04.htm "WIPO II President's Working Group Recommendation ..... Resolved [04.61], that the President and staff should proceed to investigate and analyze the Working Group's Report and the General Counsel's advice on the legal aspects of the relationship between ICANN's mission and the 21 February 2003 WIPO letter. Resolved [04.62], that following the investigation and analysis, President and Staff should produce a recommendation to the Board before the Cape Town Meeting, so that the Board may make its decision on the WIPO II recommendations during that meeting." Note the last GNSO Council resolution on this topic was from its teleconfernece on 17 April 2003: http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030417.GNSOteleconf-minutes.html "To consider the WIPO recommendations separately from the review of the existing Universal Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) which is aimed at trademarks. That the WIPO recommendations associated with Names and Acronymns of International Intergovernmental Organisations and Country Names should be subject to a policy development process to look at how they can be implemented taking into account a thorough examination of the issues surrounding the recommendations." Regards, Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council
Bruce, we have had a discussion with WIPO and they have promised us a detailed commentary on the results of the WG. We have not yet received that. Once it is in, and in accordance with the provisions you mentioned (see below), we will provide a recommendation to the Board. We have contacted WIPO with a request to speed up in view of the remaining time. I trust this is useful to you Paul -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au] Sent: 28 October 2004 03:56 To: paul.verhoef@icann.org Cc: Kurt Pritz (E-mail); John Jeffrey (E-mail); Paul Twomey-ICANN (E-mail); council@gnso.icann.org Subject: GNSO Council follow up on ICANN staff recommendation to the ICANN Board in response to the WIPO-II recommendations Hello Paul, At the last Council teleconference, a question was raised regarding the follow-up to the last Board resolution on WIPO from the KL meeting. The GNSO Council wishes to know what recommendation the ICANN staff will be making to the Board for the meeting in Cape Town. From: http://www.icann.org/minutes/kl-resolutions-23jul04.htm "WIPO II President's Working Group Recommendation ..... Resolved [04.61], that the President and staff should proceed to investigate and analyze the Working Group's Report and the General Counsel's advice on the legal aspects of the relationship between ICANN's mission and the 21 February 2003 WIPO letter. Resolved [04.62], that following the investigation and analysis, President and Staff should produce a recommendation to the Board before the Cape Town Meeting, so that the Board may make its decision on the WIPO II recommendations during that meeting." Note the last GNSO Council resolution on this topic was from its teleconfernece on 17 April 2003: http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030417.GNSOteleconf-minutes.html "To consider the WIPO recommendations separately from the review of the existing Universal Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) which is aimed at trademarks. That the WIPO recommendations associated with Names and Acronymns of International Intergovernmental Organisations and Country Names should be subject to a policy development process to look at how they can be implemented taking into account a thorough examination of the issues surrounding the recommendations." Regards, Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council
participants (2)
-
Bruce Tonkin -
Paul Verhoef