FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter
All, To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below (additions in bold). Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance. Thanks, Jonathan -- WHEREAS: 1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406> http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights protection mechanisms; 2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf) which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf); RESOLVED: 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014 proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG); 2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and 3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair.
Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or stakeholder group? Berard Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below (additions in bold).
Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-- WHEREAS: 1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights protection mechanisms; 2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf) which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf); RESOLVED: 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014 proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG); 2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and 3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair.
I am not sure I understand? From: John Berard [mailto:john@crediblecontext.com] Sent: 25 June 2014 11:01 To: <jrobinson@afilias.info> Cc: <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or stakeholder group? Berard Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below (additions in bold). Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance. Thanks, Jonathan -- WHEREAS: 1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406> http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights protection mechanisms; 2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf) which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf); RESOLVED: 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014 proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG); 2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and 3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair.
Yes, while it is helpful to note initiating constituency/stakeholder group/councillor in tracking the source of changes, and amendments should be recorded as having been moved if necessary, I don't believe this information should make its way into the text of motions. Regards David On 25 Jun 2014, at 11:00 am, John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> wrote: Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or stakeholder group? Berard Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below (additions in bold). Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance. Thanks, Jonathan -- WHEREAS: 1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights protection mechanisms; 2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf) which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf); RESOLVED: 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014 proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG); 2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and 3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair.
Point taken. No problem with me to remove. Jonathan From: David Cake [mailto:dave@difference.com.au] Sent: 25 June 2014 11:07 To: John Berard Cc: <jrobinson@afilias.info>; <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter Yes, while it is helpful to note initiating constituency/stakeholder group/councillor in tracking the source of changes, and amendments should be recorded as having been moved if necessary, I don't believe this information should make its way into the text of motions. Regards David On 25 Jun 2014, at 11:00 am, John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> wrote: Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or stakeholder group? Berard Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" < <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below (additions in bold). Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance. Thanks, Jonathan -- WHEREAS: 1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406> http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights protection mechanisms; 2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf) which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf); RESOLVED: 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014 proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG); 2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and 3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair.
Well said, David. Can the motion be revised? Berard Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote:
Yes, while it is helpful to note initiating constituency/stakeholder group/councillor in tracking the source of changes, and amendments should be recorded as having been moved if necessary, I don't believe this information should make its way into the text of motions.
Regards David
On 25 Jun 2014, at 11:00 am, John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> wrote:
Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or stakeholder group?
Berard
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below (additions in bold).
Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-- WHEREAS: 1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights protection mechanisms; 2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf) which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf); RESOLVED: 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014 proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG); 2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and 3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair.
participants (3)
-
David Cake -
John Berard -
Jonathan Robinson