Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fb116795810c8875e4492d87fa97e2a6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dear Councilors, Please see the attached amended motion for the GNSO CSC Liaison Selection for consideration at the Council meeting on 21 July. As noted in the motion, this process began on 1 June 2016, when ICANN sent a request to the ICANN Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs) and Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG) to initiate their respective organization's processes and appoint candidates to serve as members and liaisons on the CSC. As an ICANN Supporting Organization, the GNSO may appoint a liaison to the CSC, in addition to the two gTLD registry operator members to be selected by the RySG. Liaison candidates are to be confirmed by 22 July 2016, and the final slate of CSC members and liaisons as determined by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils will be sent to ICANN not later than 10 August 2016. On 02 June 2016, the GNSO Council confirmed a Selection Committee -- David Cake, Heather Forrest, Rubens Kuhl, Susan Kawaguchi, and Wolf-Ulrich Knoben -- to evaluate the candidates GNSO liaison. On 20 June 2016, the Selection Committee sent reminders to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies requesting Expressions of Interest from candidates to be submitted by 15 July 2016. Another reminder went out on 11 July. The Selection Committee has completed its evaluation of the single Expression of Interest that it received for the GNSO liaison candidate. We hereby submit the summary of our evaluation of the candidate: James Gannon. Based on our evaluation we recommend James for the role of GNSO Liaison to the CSC. We have amended the motion accordingly. Kind regards, Wolf-Ulrich
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2ea4dc38144ffb65e02afdad1e1fb194.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dear Councillors, The amended motion has been published for your convenience on the Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2016 and the GNSO CSC Liaison Evaluation has been published at: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-csc-liaison-evaluation-16jul16-en.pdf<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=KTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnuFT4taHix-2FWCICVaGtUyTfK-2Bwbfy9NdfYHVLbB3IND3CMfneG772T0N4WpYStbhZ-2FAx-2BBquazAQffqYOIVtOCQ-3D_r-2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2BX-2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2FB1vqqq7KS-2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2FPie9e6zmA6P8Lg9bA-2FCoF-2FBeef6pDcidUpqdWjVJi5E6NGc9Tq5RCkFNqQ2RYQvjsQtTQtA387hfsAVx1yccg6-2BXErpIcf2jlv3yvKn71qe0cUZcEvPAYObNnjNNoNnuBmZPoy4Bvy76aooXSvA6vzkHjEFmNPrupl4r71edlplmS0byEOsX1Lp-2Fclhq6Dm5B0mXzG-2BopTX57qrgGfqANw8K1X-2FxErJSgeQmXJCCpaqO4PDxGXf6ogBvvStD19RJHf7BtBsYqb0-2Bjan-2B4Onudl1sv-2F6frAcG-2Bn1-2BwiS-2FPjtuOKxw4o4AUHWA-3D> on page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/drafts<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=KTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnral-2F6hkupRgT5qivhStIqqcOCKnbHI4-2F0AqTh-2FDckJU_r-2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2BX-2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2FB1vqqq7KS-2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2FPie9e6zmA6P8Lg9bA-2FCoF-2FBeef6pDcidUpqdWjVJi5E6NGc9Tq5RCkFNqQ2RYQvjsQtTQtA387hfsAVx1yccg6-2BXErpIcf2jlv3yvKn71qe0cUZcEvPAYObMO5-2F8e9KvMJ-2FJhx44WFuO-2BrQgD1ea-2F5JcFHPoh4Y-2FftiHzWu8xp-2ByRhFFdiVKN4cF65ifd8zml9HmlzqExrVY8v-2FaC5eC-2FtziFlWdahtBr90XbEX6oQcR69ycQiCSviqQ5hXvvavWZf5EdapZlerM-2FYYIb9ODUUyu-2FZYrdcLCg4BSfZDA0uTaOZFqwXXlk4-2Bg-3D> Thank you. Kind regards, Glen From: WUKnoben [mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de] Sent: mercredi 20 juillet 2016 09:49 To: GNSO council <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates Dear Councilors, Please see the attached amended motion for the GNSO CSC Liaison Selection for consideration at the Council meeting on 21 July. As noted in the motion, this process began on 1 June 2016, when ICANN sent a request to the ICANN Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs) and Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG) to initiate their respective organization's processes and appoint candidates to serve as members and liaisons on the CSC. As an ICANN Supporting Organization, the GNSO may appoint a liaison to the CSC, in addition to the two gTLD registry operator members to be selected by the RySG. Liaison candidates are to be confirmed by 22 July 2016, and the final slate of CSC members and liaisons as determined by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils will be sent to ICANN not later than 10 August 2016. On 02 June 2016, the GNSO Council confirmed a Selection Committee -- David Cake, Heather Forrest, Rubens Kuhl, Susan Kawaguchi, and Wolf-Ulrich Knoben -- to evaluate the candidates GNSO liaison. On 20 June 2016, the Selection Committee sent reminders to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies requesting Expressions of Interest from candidates to be submitted by 15 July 2016. Another reminder went out on 11 July. The Selection Committee has completed its evaluation of the single Expression of Interest that it received for the GNSO liaison candidate. We hereby submit the summary of our evaluation of the candidate: James Gannon. Based on our evaluation we recommend James for the role of GNSO Liaison to the CSC. We have amended the motion accordingly. Kind regards, Wolf-Ulrich
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/bf4f98f68b6c4ea87a0e6339603cf701.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 20 Jul 2016, at 6:29 PM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org> wrote: and the GNSO CSC Liaison Evaluation has been published at: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-csc-liaison-evaluation-16jul16-en.pdf <http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=KTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnuFT4taHix-2FWCICVaGtUyTfK-2Bwbfy9NdfYHVLbB3IND3CMfneG772T0N4WpYStbhZ-2FAx-2BBquazAQffqYOIVtOCQ-3D_r-2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2BX-2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2FB1vqqq7KS-2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2FPie9e6zmA6P8Lg9bA-2FCoF-2FBeef6pDcidUpqdWjVJi5E6NGc9Tq5RCkFNqQ2RYQvjsQtTQtA387hfsAVx1yccg6-2BXErpIcf2jlv3yvKn71qe0cUZcEvPAYObNnjNNoNnuBmZPoy4Bvy76aooXSvA6vzkHjEFmNPrupl4r71edlplmS0byEOsX1Lp-2Fclhq6Dm5B0mXzG-2BopTX57qrgGfqANw8K1X-2FxErJSgeQmXJCCpaqO4PDxGXf6ogBvvStD19RJHf7BtBsYqb0-2Bjan-2B4Onudl1sv-2F6frAcG-2Bn1-2BwiS-2FPjtuOKxw4o4AUHWA-3D> on page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/drafts <http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=KTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnral-2F6hkupRgT5qivhStIqqcOCKnbHI4-2F0AqTh-2FDckJU_r-2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2BX-2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2FB1vqqq7KS-2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2FPie9e6zmA6P8Lg9bA-2FCoF-2FBeef6pDcidUpqdWjVJi5E6NGc9Tq5RCkFNqQ2RYQvjsQtTQtA387hfsAVx1yccg6-2BXErpIcf2jlv3yvKn71qe0cUZcEvPAYObMO5-2F8e9KvMJ-2FJhx44WFuO-2BrQgD1ea-2F5JcFHPoh4Y-2FftiHzWu8xp-2ByRhFFdiVKN4cF65ifd8zml9HmlzqExrVY8v-2FaC5eC-2FtziFlWdahtBr90XbEX6oQcR69ycQiCSviqQ5hXvvavWZf5EdapZlerM-2FYYIb9ODUUyu-2FZYrdcLCg4BSfZDA0uTaOZFqwXXlk4-2Bg-3D> There is an issue with the graphics on that page. If the scores out of 10 that the selection committee gave to James on the criteria for the position seem low, that is because they were actually scores out of 5.
David
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fb116795810c8875e4492d87fa97e2a6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
You’re definitely right David. Either the scale should be 1 to 5 or the bars’ length doubled. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: David Cake Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 9:59 AM To: Glen de Saint Géry Cc: mailto:council@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates On 20 Jul 2016, at 6:29 PM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org> wrote: and the GNSO CSC Liaison Evaluation has been published at: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-csc-liaison-evaluation-16jul16-en.pdf on page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/drafts There is an issue with the graphics on that page. If the scores out of 10 that the selection committee gave to James on the criteria for the position seem low, that is because they were actually scores out of 5. David
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b2a73a7dbfe1d13f90109cb1ec93a86a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I’ll look at this and send a corrected version. Thanks! Julie From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> Date: Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 5:20 AM To: David Cake <davecake@gmail.com>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org> Cc: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates You’re definitely right David. Either the scale should be 1 to 5 or the bars’ length doubled. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: David Cake Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 9:59 AM To: Glen de Saint Géry Cc: mailto:council@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates On 20 Jul 2016, at 6:29 PM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org> wrote: and the GNSO CSC Liaison Evaluation has been published at: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-csc-liaison-evaluation-16jul16-en.pdf on page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/drafts There is an issue with the graphics on that page. If the scores out of 10 that the selection committee gave to James on the criteria for the position seem low, that is because they were actually scores out of 5. David
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dear Wolf-Ulrich - Many thanks to you, and the CSC Selection Committee (David, Heather, Rubens, and Susan) for completing this evaluation, particularly given our compressed timeline. I second the amended motion. Thank you, J. From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>> Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 0:48 To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates Dear Councilors, Please see the attached amended motion for the GNSO CSC Liaison Selection for consideration at the Council meeting on 21 July. As noted in the motion, this process began on 1 June 2016, when ICANN sent a request to the ICANN Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs) and Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG) to initiate their respective organization's processes and appoint candidates to serve as members and liaisons on the CSC. As an ICANN Supporting Organization, the GNSO may appoint a liaison to the CSC, in addition to the two gTLD registry operator members to be selected by the RySG. Liaison candidates are to be confirmed by 22 July 2016, and the final slate of CSC members and liaisons as determined by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils will be sent to ICANN not later than 10 August 2016. On 02 June 2016, the GNSO Council confirmed a Selection Committee -- David Cake, Heather Forrest, Rubens Kuhl, Susan Kawaguchi, and Wolf-Ulrich Knoben -- to evaluate the candidates GNSO liaison. On 20 June 2016, the Selection Committee sent reminders to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies requesting Expressions of Interest from candidates to be submitted by 15 July 2016. Another reminder went out on 11 July. The Selection Committee has completed its evaluation of the single Expression of Interest that it received for the GNSO liaison candidate. We hereby submit the summary of our evaluation of the candidate: James Gannon. Based on our evaluation we recommend James for the role of GNSO Liaison to the CSC. We have amended the motion accordingly. Kind regards, Wolf-Ulrich
participants (5)
-
David Cake
-
Glen de Saint Géry
-
James M. Bladel
-
Julie Hedlund
-
WUKnoben