FYI Stéphane Début du message réexpédié :

De : Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> Date : 13 mars 2011 23:38:06 HNEC À : Van Gelder Stéphane <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> Objet : Réexp : [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

Stephane,

From our side;

...

What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?

- Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?

- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?

Cheers,

Chris Disspain CEO - auDA Sent from my phone

...

From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26 To: Chris Disspain Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

Chris,

The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow.

We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.

Stéphane

- A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.

- What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?

- Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?

- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?

- Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate?

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com