![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Set aside I suppose, but safely? Is it safe, or wise, to ignore the repeated advice we have gotten, prior to the request for the issues report and now in the issues report itself, that further study and research is needed? Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Fast Flux Hosting From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be> Date: Fri, April 11, 2008 6:34 am To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@gnso.icann.org> Tim Ruiz wrote: "we are guaranteeing that we won't stay within the PDP timeline" The Board governance committee wrote: "Review of PDPs that have been undertaken suggests that it is not practical to complete policy work in the timeframes contained in the PDP" The LSE wrote: "it is desirable for more realistic timings for PDP phases to be formulated". Tim your concerns are well known and can be safely set aside. Philip
participants (1)
-
Tim Ruiz