Why? This in relation to procedures for Council, not policy. If the OSC doesn't like our changes will we accept that? I doubt it. To send it back with the expectation that they rubber stamp it just wastes everyone's time. Let's tweak it to be workable for a majority (personally, I like the language on noncommercial and personal interests but a majority may not), get it approved and move on. Tim

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: AW: [council] MP3 recording GNSO Council teleconference, Thursday 28 October 2010 From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> Date: Fri, November 19, 2010 6:04 am To: William Drake <william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch> Cc: "<KnobenW@telekom.de>" <KnobenW@telekom.de>, <council@gnso.icann.org>

...

Sure, of course, it shouldn't be hard to fix, unless we manage to make it that way. Has to go back through GCOT too, no?

BD

Depends on what we're trying to do. But I expect there would be changes that would need to go back to through the OSC's team yes.

Stéphane