Suggestion for amendment: The 2nd "Resolved" should read: Resolved further, that the GNSO Council should implement the Endorsement Process for all future AOC review team selections, including the "WHOIS Policy" and the "Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS" Review Teams; Regards Wolf-Ulrich
hi On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:48 PM, <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
Suggestion for amendment:
The 2nd "Resolved" should read: Resolved further, that the GNSO Council should implement the Endorsement Process for all future AOC review team selections, including the “WHOIS Policy” and the “Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS” Review Teams;
this was the the agreed objective of the DT for months...could you clarify, why would we want to keep re-doing it? how might we make it different it we did?
1. There is concern to deeper involve the SGs in establishing the process 2. Fixing it that way seems to be too early since we're still in a learning process. Regards Wolf-Ulrich _____ Von: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Juni 2010 23:03 An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Betreff: Re: [council] Motion on AoC; amendment hi On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:48 PM, <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote: Suggestion for amendment: The 2nd "Resolved" should read: Resolved further, that the GNSO Council should implement the Endorsement Process for all future AOC review team selections, including the "WHOIS Policy" and the "Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS" Review Teams; this was the the agreed objective of the DT for months...could you clarify, why would we want to keep re-doing it? how might we make it different it we did?
Reminder to those who want amendments on the two motions we deferred today: Please submit them not later than Tuesday, 15 June. Even if it means resubmitting what you already submitted, please do so. Thanks, Chuck From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 5:03 PM To: KnobenW@telekom.de Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Motion on AoC; amendment hi On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:48 PM, <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote: Suggestion for amendment: The 2nd "Resolved" should read: Resolved further, that the GNSO Council should implement the Endorsement Process for all future AOC review team selections, including the "WHOIS Policy" and the "Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS" Review Teams; this was the the agreed objective of the DT for months...could you clarify, why would we want to keep re-doing it? how might we make it different it we did?
participants (3)
-
Gomes, Chuck -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
William Drake