RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and Cross Working Groups
I don't disagree with your thoughts Carlos, but those concerns should have been focused toward the PPSC Work Team on improving the policy development process. Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and Cross Working Groups From: carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, March 09, 2011 9:17 am To: <jeff.neuman@neustar.us>, <council@gnso.icann.org>
Dear Councillors: I fully Agree with jeff on this point and the importance to talk deeply about it, does not mean that I agreed with the document but yes with the subject. In my point of view we need a kind of regulation on this matter to improve the great work of this groups, wich give us the possibilty to get different points of view coming from different positions making reality the bottom up process, the participation and diversity. But, also, I believe that is needed to clarify how it must functioning and how they get their conclusions in order to avoid useless differences.
Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org
From: Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us To: council@gnso.icann.org Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:07:44 -0500 Subject: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and Cross Working Groups
With permission from the Business Constituency, I wanted to point you all to a document posted on the BC list at http://forum.icann.org/lists/bc-gnso/pdf6peymFRFtB.pdf regarding Cross SO/AC issues. Without commenting on whether I agree with all of the substance, I personally believe this document touches on all of the areas we should be thinking about. As you know, this subject will be up for discussion over the weekend with the council and community, and I think these questions are ones we should all be asking ourselves about CWGs in the future. I am not sure who is leading that discussion, but this document could sure help us move this along.
Thanks. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / jeff.neuman@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
Yes Tim, I know. The idea was to show another side of the same reality. I believe we can think on this, waht do you think about it ? . Thank`s. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org From: tim@godaddy.com To: carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com CC: jeff.neuman@neustar.us; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and Cross Working Groups Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:41:58 -0700 I don't disagree with your thoughts Carlos, but those concerns should have been focused toward the PPSC Work Team on improving the policy development process. Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development
work and Cross Working Groups
From: carlos dionisio aguirre
Date: Wed, March 09, 2011 9:17 am
To: ,
Dear Councillors: I fully Agree with jeff on this point and the
importance to talk deeply about it, does not mean that I agreed with the
document but yes with the subject. In my point of view we need a kind
of regulation on this matter to improve the great work of this groups,
wich give us the possibilty to get different points of view coming from
different positions making reality the bottom up process, the
participation and diversity. But, also, I believe that is needed to
clarify how it must functioning and how they get their conclusions in
order to avoid useless differences.
Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
former ALAC member by LACRALO
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
From: Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:07:44 -0500
Subject: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and Cross Working Groups
With permission from the Business Constituency, I wanted to point you all to a document posted on the BC list at http://forum.icann.org/lists/bc-gnso/pdf6peymFRFtB.pdf regarding Cross SO/AC issues. Without commenting on whether I agree with all of the substance, I personally believe this document touches on all of the areas we should be thinking about. As you know, this subject will be up for discussion over the weekend with the council and community, and I think these questions are ones we should all be asking ourselves about CWGs in the future. I am not sure who is leading that discussion, but this document could sure help us move this along.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / jeff.neuman@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
participants (2)
-
carlos dionisio aguirre -
Tim Ruiz