Statement of work for working group on reserved names - DRAFT for Council
two comments after a quick review - a) Prior to any discussion of (iv) and (v)WG should have discussion and make precedent recommendations regarding whether or not there is any merit in a) adding new names to existing reservations lists, b) taking names off of existing reservations lists and c) whether or not reservations lists, in general, are appropriate policy to continue forward with. b) voting should probably be along constituency lines - i.e. one vote per constituency. I don't think each constituency should be required to appoint three members to this TF just to ensure it gets the full defensive benefit of having three full votes. This can be avoided by simply having one vote per constituency. -r On 11-Jan-07, at 5:52 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:
<DraftStatementofWorkforWorkingGrouponReservedNames.doc>
It would probably worthwhile for the Taskforce to include the reserved list mechanism of .eu in their data gathering efforts. As far as I know this has been a rather extensive exercise including all EU member states. Thought .eu is not a gTLD the findings might very well be usefull especially in terms of geographic/geopolitical and "moral" issues. Best, tom Am 11.01.2007 schrieb Ross Rader:
two comments after a quick review -
a) Prior to any discussion of (iv) and (v)WG should have discussion and make precedent recommendations regarding whether or not there is any merit in a) adding new names to existing reservations lists, b) taking names off of existing reservations lists and c) whether or not reservations lists, in general, are appropriate policy to continue forward with.
b) voting should probably be along constituency lines - i.e. one vote per constituency. I don't think each constituency should be required to appoint three members to this TF just to ensure it gets the full defensive benefit of having three full votes. This can be avoided by simply having one vote per constituency.
-r
On 11-Jan-07, at 5:52 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:
<DraftStatementofWorkforWorkingGrouponReservedNames.doc>
Gruss, tom (__) (OO)_____ (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger! w w w w
Hi Tom I have been putting together some documentation from a variety of sources to help with this work. I'll be giving that to the working group when it's constituted and gets underway -- hopefully that will take place quickly. Kind regards. Liz ..................................................... Liz Williams Senior Policy Counselor ICANN - Brussels +32 2 234 7874 tel +32 2 234 7848 fax +32 497 07 4243 mob On 15 Jan 2007, at 13:52, Thomas Keller wrote:
It would probably worthwhile for the Taskforce to include the reserved list mechanism of .eu in their data gathering efforts. As far as I know this has been a rather extensive exercise including all EU member states. Thought .eu is not a gTLD the findings might very well be usefull especially in terms of geographic/geopolitical and "moral" issues.
Best,
tom
Am 11.01.2007 schrieb Ross Rader:
two comments after a quick review -
a) Prior to any discussion of (iv) and (v)WG should have discussion and make precedent recommendations regarding whether or not there is any merit in a) adding new names to existing reservations lists, b) taking names off of existing reservations lists and c) whether or not reservations lists, in general, are appropriate policy to continue forward with.
b) voting should probably be along constituency lines - i.e. one vote per constituency. I don't think each constituency should be required to appoint three members to this TF just to ensure it gets the full defensive benefit of having three full votes. This can be avoided by simply having one vote per constituency.
-r
On 11-Jan-07, at 5:52 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:
<DraftStatementofWorkforWorkingGrouponReservedNames.doc>
Gruss,
tom
(__) (OO)_____ (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger! w w w w
participants (4)
-
Liz Williams -
Marilyn Cade -
Ross Rader -
Thomas Keller