RE: [council] Vertical Integration
Agreed. We should at least have this issue on the agenda for the upcoming meeting. Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Vertical Integration From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> Date: Sun, September 26, 2010 9:07 pm To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>
It looks like the Board punted this... yet again.
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-25sep10-en.htm#2.11
Can’t we just send them the letter already?
This was my idea from the start. Call the WG closed, mark the interim report final and let’s move on.
Adrian Kinderis
It is on the proposed agenda but is currently a status report item. Based on my preliminary interpretation of the Board Retreat items, it appears that it may need to include an action item to respond to the Board request on VI that’s due 8 October, and that may depend on what we get from the VI PDP WG. Chuck From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 10:19 AM To: adrian@ausregistry.com.au Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Vertical Integration Agreed. We should at least have this issue on the agenda for the upcoming meeting. Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Vertical Integration From: Adrian Kinderis Date: Sun, September 26, 2010 9:07 pm To: "council@gnso.icann.org"
It looks like the Board punted this... yet again.
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-25sep10-en.htm#2.11
Can’t we just send them the letter already?
This was my idea from the start. Call the WG closed, mark the interim report final and let’s move on.
Adrian Kinderis
participants (2)
-
Gomes, Chuck -
Tim Ruiz