For me it highlights a discussion that took place in May with regards to the possibility of governments and applicants sharing the benefits of a domain name. There was a small group who saw this as a possible solution for further discussion but it got side tracked by those who didn't. I had supported it from the viewpoint of a UN protocol in another area completely, but relating the concept to parties being able to negotiate how they might share the benefits that could come out of the use of a particular geographic term as a domain name. This Board decision suggests that some consideration should be given to the concept to help to resolve conflicts between governments and applicants over geographic terms.