I’d recommend you read the SSAC papers on hijacks as well as some of the background materials for previous IRTP PDPs
A lot of the locks that exist at the moment are due to past experience ie. Domains being hijacked etc.,
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
From:
CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 9 November 2021 at 17:45
To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Subject: [CPWG] Transfer Policy Review Team: Question about the 60-days lock
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources.
Dear all,
At the TPR WG Meeting on Nov 9, 2021, the 60-days locks were discussed. The present policy – and the majority of Registry Operators, have a 60-days transfer lock after the initial registration
of a domain name AND a 60-days lock after a successful inter-registrar transfer.
Based on the discussion in the TPR WG, I would like to hear the CPWG opinion by asking the following:
1. Are we in favor of keeping the 60-days lock after the initial registration of a domain name?
2. Are we in favor of keeping the 60-days lock after a successful transfer of a domain name?
3. Could the above be optional?
4. Should the Registrant has the option to opt-out?
I did not have the time to discuss this with the At-Large TPR members and observers, hence will not ask for a poll. But hopefully CPWG can express their view at the CPWG call on Nov 10, 2021.
Regards,
Steinar Grøtterød