Hi Maureen and All,
Leaving out EPDP Phase 2 and UAM to Montreal makes sense, though the broad lines of our work is set, there are still a lot of uncertainties and I don't think
there will be much to report. So, is the abuse mitigation session still on the table? And would our 3 selected sessions from the included table be
Multistakeholder Model
Universal Acceptance
Effectiveness of Review recommendations
|
DNS over HTTPS (DoH) (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO 1/3 |
|
Future of the Multistakeholder Model of Governance (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO 2/3 |
|
Policy around Universal Acceptance and steps to be taken by TLD operators/registrars, software developers
and hosting companies (CCT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO 2/3 |
|
Enhance effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and their implementation (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO 2/3 |
Regards
Hadia
From: CPWG [mailto:cpwg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Maureen Hilyard
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 12:13 AM
To: CPWG
Subject: [CPWG] Current HIT topics for Marrakech
GNSO really don't like EPDP Phase 2 and UAM - they want to leave those for Montreal - what say you , if we went to 3 sessions which GNSO are now asking, as are others?
|
DNS over HTTPS (DoH) (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO 1/3 |
|
Future of the Multistakeholder Model of Governance (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO 2/3 |
|
EPDP Phase 2 (HIT); Unified Access Model: complying with GDPR while meeting the needs of those with
legitimate interests (CCT) (include Combatting domain abuse suggested by ALAC) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, IPC |
|
Policy around Universal Acceptance and steps to be taken by TLD operators/registrars, software developers
and hosting companies (CCT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO 2/3 |
|
Enhance effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and their implementation (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO 2/3 |
|
Impact of GDPR and EPDP Phase 1 recommendations on existing policies and
procedures (CCT) |
Support: GNSO 2/3, multiple votes for Combatting Domain Abuse may be covered in consolidated session
above |
|
Abuse Mitigation |
DoH to be scheduled separately |
|
Community Engagement Session with the Second Security, Stability, & Resiliency Review Team (SSR2) |
Pre-Meeting Webinar |
|
Community Engagement Session with the Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) |
Pre-Meeting Webinar |
|
NomCom Review Implementation Working Group |
Pre-Meeting Webinar |
Regards
Hadia
From: CPWG [mailto:cpwg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Maureen Hilyard
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 12:13 AM
To: CPWG
Subject: [CPWG] Current HIT topics for Marrakech
GNSO really don't like EPDP Phase 2 and UAM - they want to leave those for Montreal - what say you , if we went to 3 sessions which GNSO are now asking, as are others?
|
DNS over HTTPS (DoH) (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO 1/3 |
|
Future of the Multistakeholder Model of Governance (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO 2/3 |
|
EPDP Phase 2 (HIT); Unified Access Model: complying with GDPR while meeting the needs of those with
legitimate interests (CCT) (include Combatting domain abuse suggested by ALAC) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, IPC |
|
Policy around Universal Acceptance and steps to be taken by TLD operators/registrars, software developers
and hosting companies (CCT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO 2/3 |
|
Enhance effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and their implementation (HIT) |
Support: ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO 2/3 |
|
Impact of GDPR and EPDP Phase 1 recommendations on existing policies and
procedures (CCT) |
Support: GNSO 2/3, multiple votes for Combatting Domain Abuse may be covered in consolidated session
above |
|
Abuse Mitigation |
DoH to be scheduled separately |
|
Community Engagement Session with the Second Security, Stability, & Resiliency Review Team (SSR2) |
Pre-Meeting Webinar |
|
Community Engagement Session with the Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) |
Pre-Meeting Webinar |
|
NomCom Review Implementation Working Group |
Pre-Meeting Webinar |