We probably do well to remember the library scene in Shawshank Redemption…and now that they’ve established a willingness to open the contract, ask. For a couple more things
ANDY
(reading a letter from the state)
Dear Mr. Dufresne. In response to
your repeated inquiries, the State
Senate has allocated the enclosed
funds for your library project... "
(stunned, examines check)
This is two hundred dollars.
Wiley grins. Hadley glares at him. The grin vanishes.
ANDY
In addition, the Library District
has generously responded with a
charitable donation of used books
and sundries. We trust this will
fill your needs. We now consider
the matter closed. Please stop
sending us letters. Yours truly,
the State Comptroller's Office.
Andy gazes around at the boxes. The riches of the world lay at
his feet. His eyes mist with emotion at the sight.
HADLEY
I want all this cleared out before
the warden gets back, I shit you not.
Hadley exits. Andy touches the boxes like a love-struck man
touching a beautiful woman. Wiley grins.
WILEY
Good for you, Andy.
ANDY
Only took six years.
(beat)
From now on, I send two letters a
week instead of one.
From: Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 10:24 AM
To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>
Subject: Re: [CPWG] PIC commitments on ORG
After listening to the Ethos webinar, and thinking about it for a few days, a couple of ideas bubbled up.
First, to address some of the concerns that have been raised, Ethos proposes several modifications to the contract with PIC for .org. ICANN could get those amendments to the contract
(or something like them) in place before approving the sale. Since the changes were Ethos' suggestions, they shouldn't have a problem with them. (And if they do, well that would be a big red flag, wouldn't it?) That assures that they will actually
happen as advertised.
Second, having established the independent oversight committee with those contract amendments, ICANN and PIC could start populating it. Thus addressing the concerns expressed
about how independent (of Ethos' board) it would actually be.
I realize that this doesn't address every concern that has been raised. But it might be a start.
Bill Jouris
On Friday, February 21, 2020, 09:14:25 AM PST, Jonathan Zuck <jzuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:
Folks,
Take a look at the PIC commitments proposed by PIR/Ethos for ORG. At present, they focus on pricing, free speech and privacy.
https://www.keypointsabout.org/accountability
While a step in the right direction, including some binding powers in the above regards by the stewardship council, our concerns extend to the consumer trust implications
of dramatically broadening the registrant profile of .ORG. We want it to remain predominantly a space for non-profit organizations and individuals and limit the potential for DSN abuse through practices such as bulk registrations.
In any case, give it a read and we will discuss on Wednesday.
Jonathan
Jonathan Zuck | Executive Director | Innovators Network
jzuck@innovatorsnetwork.org | O 202.420.7497 | S jvzuck |
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.