I would be interested to know who you think At Large *should* be accountable to. And, especially if it as global a group as I expect, how you envision doing selection involving that group.

I don't disagree with the goal of At Large being more broadly accountable to those whose interests we are trying to champion. But I'm not seeing a realistic way to make it happen. Perhaps that's merely a failure of imagination on my part. But I'd like to see a concrete proposal for something different and visibly better before deciding we must junk what we have at the moment.

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 8:11 AM, Evan Leibovitch via CPWG

<cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.