Dear Jonathan and all,
Following up on our discussion today during the CPWG call about the geo-names, I would like to explain why I don’t think that geo-names should be incorporated into the CPWG evaluation.
In fact, the CPE role is to evaluate whether the application is a community application or not (this is what Alan explained and what I agreed on). So how it might be incorporated? as a criterion to decide if the application is a community application? Shall we request that if the application is for a geo-name string, the CPE should consider it as a community application?
The CPE evaluates if the applicant represents a community and if the application serves that community whatever the string applied for is (geo-name, language name, culture name, etc.).
Tijani
***If you require a dial out or need to state an apology, please contact At-Large staff at staff@atlarge.icann.org with your preferred number***
Dear All,
The next At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call is scheduled for Wednesday, 08 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC for 90 mins.
ADIGO Conference Bridge:
EN: 1638
ES: 1738
FR: 1838
Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865
Thank you.
Kind regards,
At-Large Staff
ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
Tijani BEN JEMAA
_______________________________________________