I think the only groups that are happy with the EPDP process are the Contracted Parties and the NCSG.  SSAC, ALAC, GAC and CSG (or at least BC & IPC) are all various shades of unhappy.  I assume ccNSO and ASO just don't care...?
------------------------------------------------------------------- -
Greg Shatan | President, ISOC-NY
greg@isoc-ny.org


"The Internet is for everyone"


On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:37 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > wrote:

Correct. I sent a link to the CPWG on 14 May. The document can be found at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-111-en.pdf.

Alan

At 2020-06-29 07:25 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:

The other interesting document is SAC 111.  They are VERY unhappy with the EPDP process and strong on both the accuracy and legal vs natural issues.

Holly

> On Jun 30, 2020, at 3:20 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > wrote:

>

> <ICANN68+GAC+Communique.pdf>

_______________________________________________

CPWG mailing list

CPWG@icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________

By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.