Great thinking! Assuming we do want to start a Wikipedia page on DNS Abuse, I'd say we might use these as inspiration for content and resources, fitting our narrative somewhere in between:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybercrime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_security

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_backbone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_security

This one is also interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_security_standards - seems right up our alley but doesn't mention any resources we'd identify as related to DNS Abuse, not even anything IETF related. Curious if we have any experienced Wikipedians in the group?  I share the concern of a looming Holy War on all things cyber, those knowing their way around would be tremendously helpful. Happy to help drafting if that is what we want to do, slightly concerned about us trying to centralize our resources, not sure this is a mean to that aim? If so however, would an initial Google doc draft help? Thanks for starting this discussion Jonathan!

Best,

J.

W dniu 14.03.2020 o 17:18, Jonathan Zuck pisze:

Folks,

One of the things we mentioned in the DNS Abuse 101 session was putting together some resources to help “end users” identify and frustrate DNS Abuase. Evin has agreed to host a “micro-site” on DNS Abuse on the At-Large site. We probably want to get a domain name for promotional purposes, however. Thoughts? Glen has offered to spend some time on the content for that site.

 

I’ve started the process of pulling the educational materials out of the DNS 101 presentation and a number of questions came up.

 

  1. The term “DNS Abuse” is pretty obscure!
    Many of the different types of abuse, phishing, ransomeware, etc. have made it into the public lexicon but the term DNS Abuse has not. Instead you more often see references to Cybercrime or Cyber Attacks, etc. The term DNS Abuse isn’t even an article in Wikipedia…so I started one!  (
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft%3ADNS_Abuse) Is it worth it to us to promote the term “DNS Abuse” because we want people thinking about this stuff in the ICANN context or should we meet the users where they are and do something like “Tips and Tricks for fending off Cyber Attacks?”
  2. Is this even a content creation exercise?
    Might very well be the case that the best use of our resources is to get existing materials into more hands. As Laureen mentioned on the call, the FTC, as an example, as created a number of resources that we could share…or even rebrand. https://youtu.be/XU8PHihT_P4. We should discuss what we have to add from a content perspective rather than a communications channel perspective. It’s true that a lot of materials on the web have a commercial purpose so it might be worth creating new materials but we should definitely. Determine where we have value to add.

 

Jonathan Zuck |  Executive Director  |  Innovators Network

jzuck@innovatorsnetwork.org | O 202.420.7497 | S jvzuck |

cid:image001.png@01D2AEED.C7EA7800

 

 


_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- 
Kind regards,
Joanna Kulesza
-------------------
Joanna Kulesza, PhD
University of Lodz, Poland
ICANN ALAC Vice Chair 
SOI: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Joanna+Kulesza+SOI
TT: @KuleszaJ